Do You Guys Agree With This?!

~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ · 12-19-2009, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by storymilo

Yes, and the only hip-hop artist (if you could call him that) is Kanye West.

Uh Eminem too.

storymilo · 12-19-2009, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conan

Uh Eminem too.

Well I was exaggerating a little.

But seriously, I'm not even close to a big hip-hop fan but I think they overlooked quite a lot with that list.

music_phantom13 · 12-19-2009, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

That's besides the point really.
It's a music magazine,even the most mainstream ones cover independent music in some form or another.

If it can't get any exposure in a magazine dedicated to music it may well be dead.

I still don't understand what you're saying. Do you mean independent music as in music having nothing to do with major labels? Because you're talking about Rolling Stone, and of course they will have basically nothing like that. The magazine is just out to make money. I could think of several magazines off the top of my head that I think are written more out of love for music than to make a profit that definitely focus on independent artists. And I'm not talking about Pitchfork music.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 12-19-2009, 12:33 PM

I'll give an example of what i'm saying..

Say you were going to do a list of the greatest 80s albums.
Even the most mainstream of magazines would include genuine independent labels from those times like Rough Trade, SST, 4AD, Beggers Banquest, Mute...and so on and so on.
Even the lists back then in mainstream magazines had albums put out by these labels on them.
How do I know this? Because that's how I found out about these labels and bands.
If you were to do a 90s list you could pretty much say the same thing.

But now it's not the case, the fact is the big 4 record companies dominate everything and little else has any chance of getting through, even with the internet at their disposal.

And that list is living proof of that.

FaSho · 12-19-2009, 01:26 PM

There's a lot of albums on there I like but not many that would be on my list, but then again, it is Rolling Stone. An interesting list would be just one album per band.

Dave.r2009 · 12-19-2009, 03:12 PM

Shame these List's always have to include rap albums when most are ****. Rolling Stones is a typical magazine who will put there typical artist's in the top 100.

**Janszoon** · 12-19-2009, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave.r2009

Shame these List's always have to include rap albums when most are ****. Rolling Stones is a typical magazine who will put there typical artist's in the top 100.

Gosh you have a real grudge against hip-hop don't you?

loveissucide · 12-19-2009, 06:55 PM

Not as bad as I was expecting but not much cop either.

Burning Down · 12-19-2009, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave.r2009

Shame these List's always have to include rap albums when most are ****. Rolling Stones is a typical magazine who will put there typical artist's in the top 100.

Sorry, but your post has too many stupid grammar mistakes. And there are lots of people who enjoy rap music and were probably thrilled that Kanye was on the list.

Rickenbacker · 12-19-2009, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burning Down

Sorry, but your post has too many stupid grammar mistakes. And there are lots of people who enjoy rap music and were probably thrilled that Kanye was on the list.

Not to mention plenty of people who enjoy rap music and are outraged that Kanye was on the list. Honestly, only one of his albums works for me.

12-19-2009, 12:33 PM	#54 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	I'll give an example of what i'm saying.. Say you were going to do a list of the greatest 80s albums. Even the most mainstream of magazines would include genuine independent labels from those times like Rough Trade, SST, 4AD, Beggers Banquest, Mute...and so on and so on. Even the lists back then in mainstream magazines had albums put out by these labels on them. How do I know this? Because that's how I found out about these labels and bands. If you were to do a 90s list you could pretty much say the same thing. But now it's not the case, the fact is the big 4 record companies dominate everything and little else has any chance of getting through, even with the internet at their disposal. And that list is living proof of that. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

12-19-2009, 06:55 PM	#58 (permalink)
loveissucide Himself Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Leuven ,Belgium, via Ireland Posts: 1,325	Not as bad as I was expecting but not much cop either. __________________ www.last.fm/user/p-mccusker http://www.mixcloud.com/pmccusker www.valjester.wordpress.com

12-19-2009, 03:12 PM	#56 (permalink)
Dave.r2009 Groupie Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 25	Shame these List's always have to include rap albums when most are ****. Rolling Stones is a typical magazine who will put there typical artist's in the top 100.