Do You Guys Agree With This?! - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-15-2009, 06:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
Ba and Be.
 
jackhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
Default

All these sort of lists will never satisfy the battle hardened music fan and I would much rather rely on word of mouth to hear new music or lost gems. Strokes Number 2? Does anyone even listen to that album anymore?It's decent enough but number 2 for what is essentially a Garage Rock revival album and not a particularly great one at that? Give me The Hunches or King Khan anyday.
__________________

“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
jackhammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 09:48 PM   #12 (permalink)
IWP
A S T H E T I C
 
IWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by APCTOOL91 View Post
So Rolling Stone published their "100 Best Albums of the Decade" this past week and I have to say WTF!? I can agree with some of these choices, but what do you guys think?

18 | MGMT: Oracular Spectacular

33 | Daft Punk: Discovery

43 | The Killers: Hot Fuss

44 | System of a Down: Toxicity

72 | Franz Ferdinand: Franz Ferdinand

74 | Red Hot Chili Peppers: Stadium Arcadium
The only good ones.
__________________
*insert witty remark here*
IWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 09:54 PM   #13 (permalink)
five years
 
jacklovezhimself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,248
Default

^ wow...how absolutely absurd.
__________________
jacklovezhimself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 09:59 PM   #14 (permalink)
/
 
Rickenbacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Conn
Posts: 1,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IWP View Post
The only good ones.
Absurd.
Rickenbacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 12:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
Blue Bleezin' Blind Drunk
 
NumberNineDream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The land of the largest wine glass (aka Lebanon)
Posts: 2,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by APCTOOL91 View Post

44 | System of a Down: Toxicity

65 | Manu Chao: Próxima Estación Esperanza

90 | Amadou & Miriam: Dimanche a Bamako
I'm just happy for these three, didn't expect them to be here.
__________________
Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?

NumberNineDream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 01:41 AM   #16 (permalink)
IWP
A S T H E T I C
 
IWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacklovezhimself View Post
^ wow...how absolutely absurd.
Sorry, I'm not really that into 2000s music, or at least most of the crap that was popular/mainstream this decade. I can confidently say that I prefer music from just about any other time period in the last 50 years (except maybe the early 60s) than music from the 2000s.

However, I'm starting to really dig a lot of music that's been getting big within the last year or two (i.e. Frankmusik, Deadmau5, Calvin Harris, etc.), and seeing as how there is probably going to be a backlash against nearly everything that was popular in the 2000s once the 2010s arrive (kind of like how everything in the 80s was frowned upon in the 90s) as well as sort of an 80s revival (at least vibe wise anyway) in electropop music that's been getting big lately, I sure as hell am looking forward to the 2010s.

All of this is my opinion, and if you don't like it, then tough ****.
__________________
*insert witty remark here*

Last edited by IWP; 12-16-2009 at 02:20 AM.
IWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 01:47 AM   #17 (permalink)
Blue Bleezin' Blind Drunk
 
NumberNineDream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The land of the largest wine glass (aka Lebanon)
Posts: 2,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IWP View Post
Sorry, I'm not really that into 2000s music, or at least most of the crap that was popular/mainstream this decade. I can confidently say that I prefer music from just about any other time period in the last 50 years (except maybe the early 60s) than music from the 2000s.

However, I'm starting to really dig a lot of music that's been getting big within the last year or two (i.e. Frankmusik, Deadmau5, Calvin Harris, etc.), and seeing as how there is probably going to be a backlash against nearly everything that was popular in the 2000s once the 2010s arrive (kind of like how everything in the 80s was frowned upon in the 90s) as well as sort of an 80s revival (at least vibe wise anyway) in electropop music that's been getting big lately, I sure as hell am looking forward to the 2010s.
That paragraph was full of contradictions.
__________________
Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?

NumberNineDream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 02:11 AM   #18 (permalink)
IWP
A S T H E T I C
 
IWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NumberNineDream View Post
That paragraph was full of contradictions.
I did kind of contradict myself when I said that I was getting into some current artists, but the ones that I mentioned aren't even that popular yet (at least not in the U.S. anyway), but are probably going to become big in the 2010s. In other words, some artists that are just getting noticed now like the ones I've mentioned, are probably going to become very popular in the 2010s, so basically late 2008-2009 is pretty much a transitional period from the 2000s-2010s, perhaps I've should've elaborated more on that in my last post. Other than that, I really don't see how I contradicted myself.
__________________
*insert witty remark here*

Last edited by IWP; 12-16-2009 at 02:21 AM.
IWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 03:06 AM   #19 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Eyrie, Vale of Arryn, Westeros
Posts: 3,234
Default

Acceptable only as Is This It is number two
Sansa Stark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 08:35 AM   #20 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickenbacker View Post
agreed. I trust rolling stone less than any other major publication honestly.
+1000%!
Saffenkoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.