Objective Quality? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2009, 10:55 AM   #1 (permalink)
What a guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 2,123
Default Objective Quality?

I've been thinking about this; there are bands out there that garner more fans and are universally liked, and bands that are hated by all. If music was truly subjective, then wouldn't all bands have an equal proportion of fans to non-fans? Which lead me to thinking that there is some objectivity in music. For example, since so many people like Radiohead, it could be objectively said that they are a good band, and since so many people hate Nickelback they are objectively a bad one. Thoughts?
__________________
last.fm
khfreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 05:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Ba and Be.
 
jackhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
Default

Nickleback have had huge success so according to many they are far from a poor band and many many people haven't heard a full Radiohead album so any music is neither good or bad- just opinions.

When you really begin to delve into music and the mainstream bands then it's easy to not like a band because you feel that other bands do what they do but better. It's called elitism and I would say that 75% of music forum members are guilty of this whether intentional or not. You also begin to judge bands (maybe unfairly) on these criteria and sometimes deny yourself a band that you would otherwise enjoy. Some of the threads and posts on MB that I really enjoy are those that proclaim a liking for a band that are unpopular amongst more hardcore bands or that are unfashionable.

I always try to gauge a band on their merits regardless of fashion or popularity and just listen to them. I do feel that older members adhere to this a lot more and profess their liking for bands than younger members. This is understandable as I was the same when I was in my teens, early 20's; only liking certain bands because it seemed the right thing to do and you didn't want to feel ostracized from the crowd. However I couldn't really give two shit's these days whether I'm seen as cool or not.

Just because a band may adhere to genre cliche doesn't neccessarily mean that they suck. If they do it well enough and are sincere then I will listen. My Magnum post a case in point.
__________________

“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
jackhammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 07:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khfreek View Post
I've been thinking about this; there are bands out there that garner more fans and are universally liked, and bands that are hated by all. If music was truly subjective, then wouldn't all bands have an equal proportion of fans to non-fans? Which lead me to thinking that there is some objectivity in music. For example, since so many people like Radiohead, it could be objectively said that they are a good band, and since so many people hate Nickelback they are objectively a bad one. Thoughts?
just because there are two options doesn't make them proportionally equal.

and no, the mere fact that some bands appeal to a lot of people isn't indicative of any arbitrary objective value. popular opinion does not equate fact.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 10:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
What a guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 2,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackhammer View Post
Nickleback have had huge success so according to many they are far from a poor band and many many people haven't heard a full Radiohead album so any music is neither good or bad- just opinions
My post had in mind a group of musically informed people, not those who listen to what's presented to them on the radio.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam
the mere fact that some bands appeal to a lot of people isn't indicative of any arbitrary objective value. popular opinion does not equate fact.
I know solid facts can't be formed; but maybe based on polls bands could at least be ranked against other bands? Though I suppose in real life these polls would be biased by the things Lee talked about: people liking bands for fashion of popularity.
__________________
last.fm
khfreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 04:24 AM   #5 (permalink)
Pale and Wan
 
Fruitonica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aus
Posts: 917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khfreek View Post
My post had in mind a group of musically informed people, not those who listen to what's presented to them on the radio.
Seriously? Insulating yourself from other peoples opinions isn't going to make yours any more objective.

Of course music and art can't be measured objectively.
Fruitonica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 09:13 AM   #6 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

I don't think that there's any such thing as objective quality. It's more about luck, being in the right place at the right time and appealing to the right type of audience.

A band like Radiohead has a always had it's appeal in places like collages & universities, ie people who go on to work in the media. That would probably account for most of their fanbase, and they consistently write music to appeal to that crowd hence their acceptence as being 'a good band'.

Whereas a band like Nickelback would probably appeal more to your average blue collar worker who isn't really interested in art or culture as a rule and just wants something to rock out a bit to.

Does that make one better than the other? well that depends on what you want. But as the people who write this stuff want artistic merit, experimentation & something to help them to inspire their own written stuff (To keep them in a job) then Radiohead will always get the nod.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 04:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
we are stardust
 
Astronomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fruitonica View Post
Seriously? Insulating yourself from other peoples opinions isn't going to make yours any more objective.

Of course music and art can't be measured objectively.
Yeah I agree that art and music will almost always be subjective. Popular opinion isn't objective.
__________________
Astronomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 05:20 PM   #8 (permalink)
nothing
 
mr dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
Default

in order for there to be objective quality about music there has to be an accepted definition of what music is.
__________________
i am the universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1 View Post
I type whicked fast,
mr dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 08:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
king of sex
 
asshat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khfreek View Post
If music was truly subjective, then wouldn't all bands have an equal proportion of fans to non-fans?
I think the fact that bands have disproportionate sales and fans only proves that taste is a subjective thing. You don't really have a gage of quality like you'd have with a household appliance.
__________________
Rye Catcher II: Electric Boogaloo
http://oldhickory666.blogspot.com/
asshat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 01:28 PM   #10 (permalink)
What a guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 2,123
Default

welp, that idea's been shot to hell
__________________
last.fm
khfreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.