Objective Quality? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-29-2009, 08:13 AM   #7 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default

I don't think that there's any such thing as objective quality. It's more about luck, being in the right place at the right time and appealing to the right type of audience.

A band like Radiohead has a always had it's appeal in places like collages & universities, ie people who go on to work in the media. That would probably account for most of their fanbase, and they consistently write music to appeal to that crowd hence their acceptence as being 'a good band'.

Whereas a band like Nickelback would probably appeal more to your average blue collar worker who isn't really interested in art or culture as a rule and just wants something to rock out a bit to.

Does that make one better than the other? well that depends on what you want. But as the people who write this stuff want artistic merit, experimentation & something to help them to inspire their own written stuff (To keep them in a job) then Radiohead will always get the nod.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.