sidewinder |
11-11-2009 10:46 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by captaincaptain
(Post 765732)
Good idea, but the flaw of it is a lot of my "90s" songs are from greatest hits or reissues/remastered albums. The percentage of albums of new material originally released in the 90's will have a much lower percentage.
|
When I rip a reissue or remaster to my computer, I always change the date to the original date. Who cares when it was re-released? I'm more interested in the original album's release year. And regarding greatest hits comps, the "good" ones will have individual years for each track, and not a year for the whole comp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NumberNineDream
(Post 765736)
PLUS: We all had much more songs from the previous decades, but who had any computer to save all his songs then. If I want to count the scattered CDs and K7s, I think I should add more than a thousand to my library.
The 00s are the decade we are living in, everything is easier to have if it is from this specific decade. And all artists, if known for a month or a year, are going to be heard.
|
These are huge factors as well. If I were to give you figures based on my iTunes library, it wouldn't account for all the CDs I have on the shelf that I haven't listened to in over 5 years and therefore haven't made it to my computer. So the digital library is usually a more accurate representation of the music we've listened to in this decade and perhaps part of the late 90s for some. I eventually would like to have all of my CD collection ripped, but honestly that probably will never happen.
I'm betting at least 50% of my digital collection is from the 00s. Even if you consider physical + digital together, it's probably still close to 50%. It's just easier to discover new bands in this decade, so we acquire more, regardless of format.
|