|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-23-2010, 04:57 PM | #71 (permalink) |
Engorged Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,536
|
Some will argue about the sound quality thing, but I can't speak on the subject.
One advantage I can speak for though is large-format album artwork. But for me, there are more disadvantages than there are advantages. One being that I've already spent over 10 grand on CDs so I'm not about to start over with vinyl just because it's cool. Maybe if I strike it rich.
__________________
last.fm | my collection on RYM | vinyl instagram @allthatyouseeandhear I'd love to see your signature/links too, but the huge and obnoxious ones have caused me to block all signatures. |
03-23-2010, 05:23 PM | #72 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
__________________
first.am |
|
03-23-2010, 09:44 PM | #73 (permalink) | |
Registered Jimmy Rustler
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
|
Quote:
A great examlpe would be the old TUBE vs SOLID STATE amp debate. Sure 30, maybe even 5 years ago tubes were the only way to go when looking for a great natural sound; but today many experienced players can hardly tell the difference in blind sound tests. In another 5 years I imagine that Solid State/Digital Representations of sound will continue to improve while anolog equipment goes farther behind. Sorry about any grammatical error, I just got back from work and Im tired as hell.
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew* *Always Checks Credentials Crew* *nba > nfl crew* *Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew* |
|
03-23-2010, 11:52 PM | #75 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
But suggesting that vinyl is poorer fidelity than a digital media like CD is baffling. Well, maybe it's true if you don't know how to take care of it. But that applies to CDs as well.
__________________
first.am |
|
03-24-2010, 03:13 AM | #76 (permalink) |
Registered Jimmy Rustler
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
|
Wurrrrrdddd. Nothing like a good old Jethro Tull Vinyl.
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew* *Always Checks Credentials Crew* *nba > nfl crew* *Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew* |
03-24-2010, 07:37 AM | #77 (permalink) |
myspace.com/stonebirdies
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Conor Oberst Was/is Here
Posts: 1,401
|
well i said i wasn't sure, those are just some i've heard
the sound quality one is though, i actually looked it up, they burn the final mastered files directly into the cd, they are top quality audio files, a vinyl however is limited to the quality it can maintain because it physically has to store the music also if my researched explanation doesn't help lucifer sam will answer to you, the breaking easier thing i'm not sure about either, someone should clarify that |
03-24-2010, 07:55 AM | #78 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 207
|
Vinyl feels more real to me. I can burn CDs from my couch, I can't make a Vinyl record. It feels like it has weight to it, it has meaning, while CDs feel disposable to me.
Granted, that's a purely personal reason. Plus, as I stated in in another thread, Vinyl forces me to listen. My ADD kicks in quickly if I have a computer with 10,000 tracks, or a CD with 25 tracks. I find myself switching songs every 30 seconds. I have no remote for my turn table, I can't click next with a mouse on my turn table. Unless I get up and switch songs, it plays from beginning to end. And that ability to force me to listen to it is worth the time it takes to find, purchase, clean, and play a record for me. It's gotten me back into actively listening to my music instead of treating it like background filler. |
03-24-2010, 09:26 AM | #79 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
Okay, I'll clarify it: they don't break easier. I would say it's just about as easy to damage a CD as it is to damage a record. |
|
03-28-2010, 08:19 PM | #80 (permalink) |
myspace.com/stonebirdies
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Conor Oberst Was/is Here
Posts: 1,401
|
but a cd is easier to fix, i actually have like this $5 dvd (works on cds) scratch fixing kit and it fixes it pretty much instantly, also tonal quality come more from the speakers
|
|