|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-28-2009, 09:24 PM | #31 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,845
|
Quote:
|
|
09-28-2009, 09:28 PM | #32 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 40
|
My dad is really into collecting records, and he's kind of got me into it too. It pretty much ends up him picking out the gems for me, while I just buy the records I like to listen to them. Recently he gave me a Zeppelin III album in mint condition with the heavier vinyl for my birthday. It's got the wheel on the front cover that you can spin and put the faces in view of the little holes. Not sure if that explanation suffices, lol. Just wondering how much it might be worth?
|
09-29-2009, 02:12 AM | #33 (permalink) | ||
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
Thick, good quality vinyl will always sound noticeably better than thin, poor quality compounds - it's a matter of physics; In good quality vinyl, the polymer molecules are smaller, better aligned, and smoother, allowing more space for the music that's being transferred from the metal cutter. Since the sound on vinyl depends on up and down movement of the stylus (as well as side to side), thickness is also key to a more dynamic sound. As with a decent guitar amp, you really notice when you turn the volume up. Crank up a Marshall JCM 800, and your guitar tone will sound sweeter and sweeter. Crank up a first press Led Zep II, and the sound really comes into its own - you start realising what the fuss is about even if you're not an audiophile. Quote:
There are three versions which are worth serious money to collectors, the top one of which is a MONO promo with a red sticker on the sleeve proclaiming "promotional dj copy monaural not for resale". These can fetch up to $1000. Sealed American presses with the original black sticker can fetch top dollar too, and these have the serial number SD-7201, rather than the later 5-digit number. The UK press to find has 2 identifying features - the first is, of course, the serial number, which should be 2401002. Later presses added a dash - ie 2401-002. The second feature is the production credit given to Jimmy Page appears at the top of the label, with Executive Producer: Peter Grant appearing beneath. On later labels, Jimmy is relegated to the bottom of the label, and Peter's credit is removed altogether! |
||
09-29-2009, 08:04 AM | #34 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: houston,tx
Posts: 89
|
Just wondering if anyone knows if The Who's Live at Leeds come with any extras? I recently found one on a job and it had a poster some glossies and some questionable sigs. If anyone has heard of this please let me know
|
09-29-2009, 10:56 AM | #35 (permalink) |
Cardboard Box Realtor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hobb's End
Posts: 7,648
|
I use to collect vinyl about five years ago, it was fun to find and listen to, but it's incredibly impractical. I actually ended up selling all my records when I moved to Wales, and by that time I had already gotten over the novelty of it in favor of storing music on hard drives, makes it a lot easier to share.
|
09-29-2009, 01:50 PM | #37 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 40
|
Thanks for the info! It has the serial number SD 7201, but it isn't sealed. Either way it's my favorite Zeppelin album and a fantastic gift, so worth a lot of money, or not, I still love it.
__________________
When out of valid arguments, criticize the other persons grammar. |
09-29-2009, 04:33 PM | #38 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 194
|
Excellent!
Of course, as with antiques or any form of collecting, the main point of collecting vinyl is to enjoy it - that's why I say you can pick up ANY Red/Plum Zep album and it will sound amazing, if it's not scratched to death. There are certain presses that sound better than others though - and there are rumours I've heard about some early pressings being mastered in such a way that cheaper record players simply couldn't handle them, and many "scratched" copies of mind-blowing vinyl were returned to stores - so a really early press may not suit your system if you're on a tight budget. For example, some US audiophile collectors swear by a particular US pressing of LZ II with the initials RL in the dead wax - apparently copies can still be found in secondhand shops for less than $10. The sound on this pressing (RL was the mastering engineer) is supposed to render the music breathtakingly lifelike (and is the one I heard the above rumour about) - but I couldn't verify that, as US presses hardly ever turn up in the UK. Like "Antiques Roadshow" (UK TV show), there's always interest in what it's worth - that's another part of the fun of collecting - but I mainly want to find the finest possible sounding recordings of the music I really dig. LZ III is a superb album. I just double checked mine, which I got from a local shop for £10, and yes, it's definitely the earliest press possible, and Near Mint - which is nice. Now I need another that I can actually play without worrying about decreasing its value... |
09-29-2009, 09:24 PM | #39 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 40
|
Oh, I also have a live Dark Side of the Moon album, but instead of going by Pink Floyd they go by The Screaming Abdabs, and instead of calling it DSotM they call it Brain Damage. I've never seen anything like it since so I'm curious if you know anything about it.
__________________
When out of valid arguments, criticize the other persons grammar. |
09-30-2009, 01:58 AM | #40 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 194
|
I'd never heard of it until now - although I know that "The Screaming Abdabs" was one of many names (including The Meggadeaths and Sigma 6) that was used by Syd Barrett's groups prior to Pink Floyd.
I Googled "Screaming Abdabs" and "Dark Side of The Moon", and from the various bits and pieces that popped up, it seems that this would be a bootleg - possibly one of a large number of mixing desk recordings that were distributed in the 1970s, particularly of Floyd. Some record plants were only too happy to get the work to press extra vinyl (and be paid for it!), hence the different names used, so that execs wouldn't trouble themselves with investigating why there were so many Floyd albums being released... Whatever, most Floyd bootlegs I've heard from that time sound great - and I've even read one report of a recording matching your description as sounding better than the studio release. There seems to be some dispute over the date on the sleeve (1972), but it's possible, as Floyd did gig the album some 6 months or so prior to its release. Disclaimer: I don't condone the purchase of illegal material, but I know how easy it is to buy one accidentally and then be delighted with it In my early collecting days, I found one called "Forgotten Songs" by Marillion and didn't even realise it was a boot because it contains loads of stuff I hadn't previously heard by them, like a recording of Genesis' "I Know What I Like" - and the packaging style looked like it could have been created by a band just starting out and on a tight budget - like the Chemical Alice EP (Mark Kelly's band prior to Marillion). Forgotten Songs sounds quite bad - and the Chemical Alice EP isn't amazing sounding (although the music is great!); Last edited by Certif1ed; 09-30-2009 at 02:06 AM. |
|