Auto-Tune Abuse

~~CAPTAIN CAVEMAN~~ · 09-25-2009, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antonio

he's not really, i just felt like stirring the pot a bit, hehe

sounds to me like YOU are the troll

gunnels · 09-25-2009, 06:18 PM

I'm trollicus!

simplephysics · 09-25-2009, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunnels

I'm trollicus!

See, these are the kind of comments we try to avoid.
Go post something constructive now.

Anteater · 09-25-2009, 09:11 PM

Autotune can be rather effective given the proper context, but it really has become quite overkill as of late. I mean, what's the point of making pitch-perfect vocals if they so darn fake?

Antonio · 09-25-2009, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CAPTAIN CAVEMAN

sounds to me like YOU are the troll

ok

but yeah, i'm through with my evil, trolling ways

86 Position · 09-26-2009, 03:55 PM

autotune can bring crazy results to things other than vocals...crazy results. using it for vocals alone isnt scratching the surface at all

kotzen · 07-07-2010, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 86 Position

autotune can bring crazy results to things other than vocals...crazy results. using it for vocals alone isnt scratching the surface at all

oh hell yeah granting tonality to sounds that in nature would not normally possess tonality like the wind. i find those possibilities fascinating

~~TumorAttitude~~ · 07-15-2010, 12:36 AM

I hate when they butcher someones voice with vocal effects rather then using it to compliment the natural tone of their singing. This is nothing new.

Vocal effects can be awesome though:

^^^Back me up on that shit, Fasho.

nolvorite · 07-15-2010, 12:21 PM

It makes horrible singers (like T-Pain) sound like robots

Stone Birds · 07-15-2010, 01:51 PM

i decided to give autotune a chance after hearing this:

and i created this "Sylvan" auto-tune used

oh and tumour i also like sleigh bells but they just don't fit in with anything else on my ipod so i just listen to them off my pc.

i believe auto-tune is better as a simple vocal effect but not completely tuning on the lead vocals of "Sylvan" i set the auto-tune only about 30%, but on the lines "like a bird in the morning" the auto-tune is at probably 80%, i'll rarely put auto-tune up to 100% because it takes too much from the original vocals.

07-15-2010, 01:51 PM	#80 (permalink)
Stone Birds myspace.com/stonebirdies Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Conor Oberst Was/is Here Posts: 1,401	i decided to give autotune a chance after hearing this: and i created this "Sylvan" auto-tune used oh and tumour i also like sleigh bells but they just don't fit in with anything else on my ipod so i just listen to them off my pc. i believe auto-tune is better as a simple vocal effect but not completely tuning on the lead vocals of "Sylvan" i set the auto-tune only about 30%, but on the lines "like a bird in the morning" the auto-tune is at probably 80%, i'll rarely put auto-tune up to 100% because it takes too much from the original vocals. __________________ Silk & Tree Records //\\//\\/\\/\/\/\\\\\\\\///\/\/\/\/\\////\/\\\\\///\V //\\//\\/\\/\/\/\\\\\\\\///\/\/\/\/\\////\/\\\\\///\V soundcloud.com/stonebirds [Link removed by mod, no advertising] ... Damn those mods are always gettin ya :) Last edited by Stone Birds; 07-15-2010 at 02:02 PM.

09-26-2009, 03:55 PM	#76 (permalink)
86 Position Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 125	autotune can bring crazy results to things other than vocals...crazy results. using it for vocals alone isnt scratching the surface at all

07-15-2010, 12:36 AM	#78 (permalink)
~~TumorAttitude~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Purgatory Posts: 749	I hate when they butcher someones voice with vocal effects rather then using it to compliment the natural tone of their singing. This is nothing new. Vocal effects can be awesome though: ^^^Back me up on that shit, Fasho.

07-15-2010, 12:21 PM	#79 (permalink)
nolvorite Music Addict Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USVI Posts: 88	It makes horrible singers (like T-Pain) sound like robots