Covers vs Original - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2009, 09:18 AM   #21 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Liljagare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
I totally disagree. And I think Cash's vocal delivery and the way that version is recorded only serve to highlight the fact that the lyrics are kind of weak. Reznor knows he's not much of a lyricist so he makes the sonic texture and the percussion the things you focus on in the original, which I think is a much better choice.
It's completly personal how powerful a song is and how much you think it speaks to you. "Hurt" is a good example of this. In my opinion, The Cash version is more personal in the way it was sung..but I don't mind agreeing to disagree.

Last edited by Liljagare; 09-11-2009 at 09:25 AM.
Liljagare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 10:41 AM   #22 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Minstrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 436
Default

Pretty much every time the Byrds covered Bob Dylan was magic.

I think the Violent Femmes' cover of "Children Of The Revolution" surpasses T.Rex's original.
__________________
"Blow your tuneless trumpet, the choice is yours / We don't want the glamour, the pomp and the drums / The Dublin messiah scattering crumbs"
Minstrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.