|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Pearl Jam or Stone Temple Pilots? | |||
Stone Temple Pilots | 29 | 30.85% | |
Pearl Jam | 52 | 55.32% | |
They're both awful. | 19 | 20.21% | |
Someone already posted this, you're wasting precious space. | 3 | 3.19% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-18-2012, 05:28 PM | #121 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
|
|
05-18-2012, 06:26 PM | #122 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
Pearl Jam- Faithfull #02 - YouTube |
|
05-18-2012, 06:56 PM | #123 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
I'm very surprised people here like STP. They were the least original, most fake band of that early 90s grunge/alternative scene. Their sound was derived from bands like pearl jam and AIC. I can even think of one of their more recent songs that sound exactly like this nirvana song, I believe it's "stay away" that I'm thinking of. I'll have to figure it out and post it.
|
05-18-2012, 07:25 PM | #124 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
Samba Nova - Stone Temple Pilots - YouTube |
|
05-19-2012, 04:04 AM | #125 (permalink) | ||
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Power Metal Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History |
||
05-19-2012, 05:09 AM | #126 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
Eh. I don't think either of the three are very. When I was a kid I used to like stp and bush quite a bit. Now neither really appeal to me. I haven't heard much from candlebox. I know bush's newer stuff Is god awful. I've never heard a bush song that instantly made me think "they got that from AIC" or "that's a nirvana rip off". I have thought those things while listening to stp.
|
05-19-2012, 08:04 AM | #127 (permalink) | |||
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Really though, how do you define 'better'? A greater technical requirement? Atypical arrangements that eschew pop chart conventions but are safely within the lines of the genre it mimics? I like to think I was clear in saying that I prefer more visceral music, seems to me State of Love and Trust pretty well nails it. Then you offer Faithful, but when it comes to the Yield album it's ALL about Do The Evolution for me - again I prefer visceral energy. Hell, they almost breakdown into the climax of Jeremy 2 minutes into Faithful, listen to Vedder's vocalizations, they're not quite as loud but it's the same sounds. While you might prefer it, I still think it sounds kind of cheesy. Here's the ultimate thing though, when STP try to do other styles it sounds like they're trying as opposed to doing. It comes across as insincere and hollow. One of my personal favourite albums is Stan Getz and Luiz Bonfa - The Jazz Samba Encore! - that Samba Nova song doesn't live up, it sounds like a rock band trying to do a samba and, to me, it's cheesy - as hell. That's not meant to diminish your enjoyment or preference of their music. But if you're going to keep posting about how much 'better' they are and how your choices for either group are 'better' examples of their music than mine or other individuals... then please learn to quantify your opinion with something more than just, 'I like it better' or 'here's a better example'. |
|||
05-19-2012, 02:23 PM | #130 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
i think my biggest problem with pearl jam is eddie's voice it's so growl like and harsh ..unlike scott's beautiful voice so that can adapt to a hardstyle and a soft-style.. |
|
|