![]() |
Out of curiosity what do people in this thread consider to be the cut off point between what's old and what's new?
|
Quote:
|
I'd say 1997.
|
I don't get new releases very often, though I'd say most of my listening goes towards more recent albums (5 years old). I listen to a good bit of old stuff though. Right now, though, I'd say more new things.
|
It's hard to say... I don't really consider Radiohead and Oasis and such old, and they got their start in the early 90s
|
Quote:
Funk from the 70's has that earthy live vibe to it that separates it from the bland safe production that can be heard on a lot of music these days. The Quantic Soul Orchestra are a relatively new band who purposefully record their albums as lo-fi as possible to retain that dirty sound that funk needs. Good production certainly helps some bands but pre computer production is definitely a plus for me. The music sounds so much more organic. |
Dac: I'd call that more on the old side myself. I'm also thinking of it in albums, though, so if I were to listen to more new Radiohead than the older stuff, I'd say my taste is more new for them.
|
Quote:
|
To me if you cut it off at like 2000 then you have new, old, and really ****ing old when it comes to bands like The Beatles, so for the sake of the topic of this thead, I'd say like 1990 would be my new-old threshold.
|
Old would be from another decade, or earlier in this decade. Basically, a change in musical sound. I'd think early 2000's would sound different from now, anyway.
Dac: Yeah, you could say I look at it in that light. It really just slips more into old as you go back. 90's would be somewhat old, and the 20's would be damn old. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.