|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-07-2009, 08:39 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
US and UK versions of albums (and others): why do they exist?
Do record companies really think that shuffling the order of the tracks on an album and switching out a song or two will really appeal more to one market or the other? Or is it all a big scam to get people to buy both the domestic and the import versions of an album?
Your thoughts? |
01-07-2009, 10:02 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Ba and Be.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
|
Some albums are released later in the opposing country so sometimes B sides and other tracks that were recorded after are added on. It's exactly the same with DVD'S too. The amount of stuff that goes missing extra wise is ridiculous sometimes. In fact that gives me a little pointer. I know that some extras don't have the copyright in different countries or the release label doesn't so maybe that's the same with CD's?
__________________
“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
|
01-07-2009, 11:10 AM | #4 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
The US market seems to have it good. A lot of albums have the "Best Buy" bonus tracks, which since i live in the UK i cannot get. And then we have itunes bonus tracks. Which means i have to buy a digital copy of the album. Now, call me crazy, but i prefer to have a physical copy of the album. Plus, bonus tracks are sometimes some of the better songs on the album.
__________________
Apocalyptic and insane - my dreams will never change. It's not a matter of luck - it's just a matter of time. Tonight, we take control of the world. |
|
01-07-2009, 03:24 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
|
Often, tracks are removed or replaced on one version for objectionable content.
It may also be a question of formats. Magical Mystery Tour of the Beatles was always an EP with 6 songs on it in the original release. In the States, Capitol decided that the EP format is unlikely to be a big seller, so they made it into an LP, reordering the tracks on the first side and adding all the Beatles' singles of the time on the second side. |
01-07-2009, 03:31 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2009, 03:39 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Hard to say. Each album has a couple tracks the other doesn't have. And the song order is different but I've never understood the reasoning behind the two different versions of the album.
|
01-07-2009, 03:47 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
As for bonus tracks in Japan, it's probably to deter them from buying imports before the record is released on their home turf. Possible larger discrepancy in release dates?? Alternatively it may be that there are different expectations of the length of an LP there, so that anything falling short of that length will end up with added material. |
|
01-07-2009, 03:58 PM | #10 (permalink) | |||
I'm sorry, is this Can?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,989
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|