Worst Music Media Publication (indie, rock, album, magazine, reviews) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2008, 09:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Question Worst Music Media Publication

I don't know if there is a thread on this yet, but there should be.

What, in your opinion, is the WORST music media publication? Not in terms of the layout/budget, but in terms of quality/bias of reviews. What ranks the highest on your shitlist? (It could range from newsmagazines to an online archives to whatever other music media you read.)
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 09:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Easy option but the NME by a mile.

Even when I was it's target demographic (I.E. teenage indie kid) I could feel my brain cells melting whenever I read it.

Just a bunch of clueless morons more interested in being cool than finding any good music.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 09:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default Rolling Stone

Rolling Stone is the worst in my opinion. All of the major releases they review are always medicore until the album gets big, then they change their tone.

They've also been doing really sh!tty articles and cover stories in the recent years, such as a nameless amount of Jonas Brothers articles and things like "Rock Band vs. Guitar Hero."
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 09:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
we are stardust
 
Astronomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
Default

Any publication that attempts to compile a list of the "Top 100" anythings.
__________________
Astronomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 10:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
mr. goth glam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Waverly, VA.
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiseido_red View Post
Any publication that attempts to compile a list of the "Top 100" anythings.
I can go with that.
__________________
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c84/barnaclelapse/petty2.jpg
mr. goth glam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 10:49 PM   #6 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiseido_red View Post
Any publication that attempts to compile a list of the "Top 100" anythings.
It's a good thing Music Banter aint a magazine...
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 11:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonace View Post
Rolling Stone is the worst in my opinion.
I agree. I have three main problems with Rolling Stone (oo, my first time using a numbered list):
  1. They only seem to cover teenybopper crap and new music by classic rock dinosaurs. Two things I don't give a shit about.
  2. I don't like reading a music magazine where I feel like I know more about music than the people writing the articles.
  3. Sort of off topic, but their movie reviews suck. They give every fucking movie a good review. I appreciate the positive attitude and everything but this give me zero frame of reference for whether or not I might enjoy the movie.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 11:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

RS is unfairly biased towards mainstream pop/R&B music, and it's pretty sad that they represent such a huge portion of the industry. Although their reviews are usually impartial and very well-written, it seems like they go easy on everybody and it makes for an extremely hard time to figure out whether a record's good or not.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 03:36 AM   #9 (permalink)
why bother?
 
Bulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 4,840
Default

NME easily. I blame them for a lot of the mediocre music which makes up the British rock scene today. Their excuse for journalism these days is just a complete joke too
Bulldog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 02:03 PM   #10 (permalink)
Back to mono
 
WaspStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 509
Default

Anyone who hates Rolling Stone mag (hopefully everyone) needs to check out Elvis Costello's liner notes for the Rhino version of Get Happy!!!

It's hilarious; he dismisses the magazine as a "rag [which] has, over the years, undergone a remarkable transformation from an organ of the supposed counterculture to a shallow pop-culture shop window for starlets and acrobats while funding their efforts with generous amounts of Big Tobacco advertising revenue and offers of penis enlargement to easily deluded teenage boys."
__________________
"This sure doesn't look like 'Crazy Ernie's Amazing Emporium of Total Bargain Madness!'"
WaspStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.