Radiohead or Led Zeppelin - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Who do you prefer
Radiohead 17 65.38%
Led Zeppelin 8 30.77%
I like them both equally 1 3.85%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2008, 07:42 PM   #41 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Zombeels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgd85 View Post
To be honest I think they are about equal, but Led Zeppelin edges them out a bit. Although they have very different musical sounds they have comperable careers. Led Zeppelin had 8 studio albums, 6 of which are amazing. Radiohead has 7 studio albums, 5-6 of which are equally impressive. They both are known for an amazing live show. I think in the terms of instrumentation, Led Zeppelin has them covered. Vocals are both so great, but instinct tells me Roger has a better voice than Tom. I think one place Radiohead outperforms Led Zeppelin is in creativity and their abillity to change their music over time. Just my opinion.
That's Robert.
__________________
What It Is
Zombeels is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 08:35 PM   #42 (permalink)
down the rabbit hole
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: the mountain called monkey
Posts: 764
Default

OMG! your right, i musta made a mistake
joyboyo53 is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 11:56 PM   #43 (permalink)
dac
MB's Biggest Fanboy
 
dac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgd85 View Post
I think in the terms of instrumentation, Led Zeppelin has them covered. Vocals are both so great, but instinct tells me Robert has a better voice than Tom.
Do go on... how do they have them covered? Because Paige's solo's are a lot easier than people realize. My roomate picked up guitar about a year ago, and nails the Achilles' solo perfectly. And Thom has a greater vocal range than Mr. Plant if you wish to measure the bands in such aspects.
__________________

dac is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 01:00 AM   #44 (permalink)
eat the masters
 
debaserr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dac View Post
Do go on... how do they have them covered? Because Paige's solo's are a lot easier than people realize. My roomate picked up guitar about a year ago, and nails the Achilles' solo perfectly. And Thom has a greater vocal range than Mr. Plant if you wish to measure the bands in such aspects.
i agree
__________________
Last.FM
debaserr is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 02:30 AM   #45 (permalink)
Ba and Be.
 
jackhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
Default

Why do these god damn 'VS' threads have more replies arguing the merits of certain bands than genuine well made threads about new bands or classic bands or good lists etc? I think people just love to come and argue the toss on here instead of making valued contributions. These 'VS' threads are becoming so tiresome with the same old crap written. Some people like Zeppelin. some people like radiohead. some like both. They share very few similarities music wise. Here ends the thread.
__________________

“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
jackhammer is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.