|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Whitewater!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,882
|
![]() Quote:
I agree with ledzepstu. ledzepplin were more "biggest since the beatles" than gnr could ever be.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 107
|
![]() Quote:
No but you are making yourself look like an @$$ by making chidish comments like that. And again show me where LZ played in front of more than 7m people in a three year span. If you cannot prove that then gnr were just as big as LZ if not bigger at their peak. So, either put up or shut up, because just saying it is not going to make it true. Yes when LZ were at their peak they were the biggest band since the beatles but when gnr was at their peak they suprassed that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |