I Hate The Beatles Hype. (pop, rolling stones, u2, Radiohead) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-17-2008, 05:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Faubioca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 9
Thumbs down I Hate The Beatles Hype.

Controversial as it is and I know by posting this I've made major enimies but I am so tired of their hype and I feel they are given way too much credit for what they did; starting out as a pop band that followed the trend and made a bunch of drug induced recordings and went their seperate ways people act like lenon was jesus and ringo is a douche and paul is a sap who treated his one-legged 21 year old wife like crap. George was the only unhyped member of the band and that poor bastard died of cancer.
Ok I am going to music hell but I feel there are way more talented artists and bands than the beatles, it was just a bunch of tart brit-pop and Bono from U2 should wank eachother off.
I feel that there are excellent bands from Europe and especially the UK I just think it's funny how much we give these guys a golden enema for their "influence" in modern day music, which is generally crap I don't like anyways.
Why can't we focus on the rolling stones, radiohead, led zep, and so many more beautiful bands that do their own thing the beatles just had hype and it propelled them to today as being one of the major "influences of music" I say **** on that.

Anyone with me? probably not but I am just checking.

Faubioca
Faubioca is offline  
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.