|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-20-2008, 01:26 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,050
|
I find this to be pretty inaccessible.
MySpace.com - STALAGGH tribute page - 32 - Male - Huntington Beach, US - www.myspace.com/audio_terrrorist |
07-20-2008, 01:46 PM | #12 (permalink) | |||||
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 29
|
I've always loved how TMR sounded and I'm still surprised that people find it unlistenable considering what else is out there. I personally think Feist's voice is the most noisy, inaccessible sound I've ever heard. Either it's pure crap or avant-garde noise that's light years ahead of everything else and us primitive humans cannot comprehend it.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||||
07-20-2008, 03:04 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
Back to mono
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
By your definition, it's all down to the current fashion. In the 1950's, Elvis Presley could have been considered inaccessible. Well, I suppose that given their reputation and most reviews of their music that I've read, they are considered accessible, but I don't understand why. The melodies seem dirge-like to me and the music ranges from bland to forgettable, with a stop off at generic. This isn't a critical review (that same description could be applied to some of the bands I actually like), just my reasoning as to why I don't see why they're "accessible." I'm not denying that they are, just saying that I don't really get it.
__________________
"This sure doesn't look like 'Crazy Ernie's Amazing Emporium of Total Bargain Madness!'" |
|
07-20-2008, 03:09 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
Moodswings n' Roundabouts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: At the corner of Dude and Catastrophe
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
|
|
|