|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-29-2008, 08:54 AM | #162 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
I believe in identifying responsibility rather than the premise. The measure of anything is best taken from result rather than appearance. art pop to me is not all bad either. For instance, Beck is Art Pop to me and I REALLY enjoy Beck. I just find Radiohead exceptionally boring, "safe", pedestrian, "correct". That sort of thing. Bottom Line: ANY music that has a reputation that is popular enough to proceed it demands the sincerest of scrutiny from me as a listener and long time musical appreciator. Radiohead did not live up to that reputation for me. I just don't get it. It doesn't challenge me whatsoever. Just like certain people don't "get" Bob Dylan, I don't "get" Radiohead. Radiohead is NOTHING like The Velvet Underground, I'll give you that. But the Velvets were most definitely the closest thing I can imagine to a pseudo intellectual garage/psych experimental pop group. The very essence actually. Have you heard the Lou Reed E.A.P. thingamabob? I saw that the other day when I was picking up some new and used CDs. I was tempted to grab it but having been so disappointed with Lou's latter day solo cannon, I opted out. |
|
07-30-2008, 01:22 AM | #164 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
Sorry. I assumed you were talking about art rock, which actually exists. But if you're the person defining the genre, you can claim whatever the fuck you want, huh? Not really much sense arguing. Shenanigans.
__________________
first.am |
|
07-30-2008, 12:19 PM | #165 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
I f*cking hate it when people argue over weither or not a band is part of a genre they just made up.
|
07-30-2008, 12:34 PM | #166 (permalink) | ||
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
Friend, lets bring this full circle to a common ground of intelligent conversation. I took the time to defined clearly what I was referring to via the jargon I used. Maybe that's a misconception on my behalf. I will give you that much. But if all you can do as a music appreciator is be short, sarcastic and withdrawn, how could I possibly see the matter through your ears so to speak? I have been searching and searching for an enthusiastic and INTELLIGENT music appreciation community. You wanna know what the two biggest draw backs that have hindered that process so far are? <whether you do or don't> Those two specific handicaps are comprised of age differences (most people under 18 live to insult themselves on message boards, not all though.) and cliques. Thankfully I haven't got a strong whiff of either here yet. If you REALLY care about music AND communication, you'll avoid dismissive one sentence remarks that attempt to justify your brevity and take the time to honestly spell yourself out intelligently. What the hell else is personal passion/special interest based discussion for? Quote:
Might try actually defending your position there boo boo. No edge for me friend. Little groove and very minimal. Lame IMO. About as energetic as a boiled cabbage. |
||
07-30-2008, 12:52 PM | #167 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Radiohead shouldn't be pigeonholed into such a dumb term weither it's taken seriously as a real genre or not. Radiohead are their own band, hipsters and proggies argue all the time over weither or not they should be considered alternative rock or progressive rock or something else, they don't quite conform to anything. Theres very few well known bands that have that kinda ambiguity.
I don't know what art pop is, but it seems like a very limiting term for a band like Radiohead since I don't think of them as a pop group. I don't think something should be called pop just becauses there some pop structures being used, because just about anything could be called pop then. |
07-30-2008, 01:04 PM | #168 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
|
|
07-30-2008, 01:12 PM | #169 (permalink) | |||||
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
I would love to debate your definition of art pop , but it's trying so hard to be clever it just ends up being totally meaningless.
I mean let's look at your definition Quote:
Any band could claim to have what could be considered 'a clique mentality' That's why you buy t shirts and sing along at gigs. A band's image? it's message? it's politics? it's fashion? all of them? none of them? You're being far to vague on this. Quote:
Quote:
Sorry but in this context this means absolutely nothing unless you are prepared to explain it. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|||||
07-30-2008, 01:20 PM | #170 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
edit: I think what I am going to do to show a sincere level of sincerity and appreciation for Radiohead is dig out my copy of Kid A and give it a spin. I remember going...OMG, this is terrible. Who knows, maybe I will re-orientate myself. I have done that with MANY groups. I will feedback along with a detailed response before the end of the day if I can find it readily. I have roughly 6000 CDs in the room I believe it's in so it may take a while to find it. Last edited by whogivesaflux; 07-30-2008 at 01:38 PM. Reason: further quick thoughts... |
|
|