Best Artist: Round 2: Poll N (lyrics, dance, funk, indie) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Best Artist: Round 2: Poll N Best Artist: Round 2: Poll N (lyrics, dance, funk, indie)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Pick a band
Alice in Chains 4 9.52%
Beatles, The 13 30.95%
Bob Dylan 14 33.33%
Explosions in the Sky 1 2.38%
The Smiths 10 23.81%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
Page 3 of 10 12 3 45 Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2008, 10:09 PM   #21 (permalink)
Da Hiphopopotamus
 
sweet_nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
Default
How could The Beatles be winnig? C'mon guys don't they win everything? Yes we all know they're the most influential rock band ever, but better than the Smiths or even Bob Dylan, are you guys high?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
America does folk, hardcore and mathrock better and that's 90% of what I give 2 shits on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartsengrafs View Post
sweet nothing openly flaunts the fact that he is merely the empty shell of an even more unadmirable member. his loneliness and need for attention bleeds through every letter he types. edit: i would just like to add that i'm ashamed that he's from texas. surely you didn't grow up in texas, did you sweet nothing?
sweet_nothing is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:11 PM   #22 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Uh, so? They win for a reason, they're really damn good and have a diverse catalogue that appeals to almost (OOMPHLOL) everyone.
ProggyMan is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:23 PM   #23 (permalink)
Da Hiphopopotamus
 
sweet_nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan View Post
Uh, so? They win for a reason, they're really damn good and have a diverse catalogue that appeals to almost (OOMPHLOL) everyone.
It's just so mudane to see them win, they aren't as good as the Smiths or Dylan musicaly or lyricaly, imo.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
America does folk, hardcore and mathrock better and that's 90% of what I give 2 shits on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartsengrafs View Post
sweet nothing openly flaunts the fact that he is merely the empty shell of an even more unadmirable member. his loneliness and need for attention bleeds through every letter he types. edit: i would just like to add that i'm ashamed that he's from texas. surely you didn't grow up in texas, did you sweet nothing?
sweet_nothing is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:24 PM   #24 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Musically they're a thousand times more adventurous and complex than Dylan and The Smiths. Not better per se, but certainly no reason the see them lose. Sure it's mundane, but so what?
ProggyMan is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:27 PM   #25 (permalink)
Da Hiphopopotamus
 
sweet_nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan View Post
Musically they're a thousand times more adventurous and complex than Dylan and The Smiths. Not better per se, but certainly no reason the see them lose. Sure it's mundane, but so what?
maybe it's time for a change, i know this may come as a shock to you but i think they're not as good as u think they are, and more complex......no.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
America does folk, hardcore and mathrock better and that's 90% of what I give 2 shits on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartsengrafs View Post
sweet nothing openly flaunts the fact that he is merely the empty shell of an even more unadmirable member. his loneliness and need for attention bleeds through every letter he types. edit: i would just like to add that i'm ashamed that he's from texas. surely you didn't grow up in texas, did you sweet nothing?
sweet_nothing is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:34 PM   #26 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Change isn't always good. I voted for Dylan btw. As to complexity, but Day In The Life? I Want You? Happiness Is A Warm Gun? Revolution 1?
ProggyMan is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:39 PM   #27 (permalink)
Da Hiphopopotamus
 
sweet_nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
Default
Barbarism Begins At Home? This Charming Man? William, It Was Really Nothing? Girl Afraid? And least we not forget HOW SOON IS NOW?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
America does folk, hardcore and mathrock better and that's 90% of what I give 2 shits on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartsengrafs View Post
sweet nothing openly flaunts the fact that he is merely the empty shell of an even more unadmirable member. his loneliness and need for attention bleeds through every letter he types. edit: i would just like to add that i'm ashamed that he's from texas. surely you didn't grow up in texas, did you sweet nothing?
sweet_nothing is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:39 PM   #28 (permalink)
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweet_nothing View Post
How could The Beatles be winnig? C'mon guys don't they win everything? Yes we all know they're the most influential rock band ever, but better than the Smiths or even Bob Dylan, are you guys high?
The Beatles are better than The Smiths in every concievable way and not just because The Smiths were a bunch of emo kids or because Morrissey is a huge spiteful douchebag who wrote some of the most retarded and overrated lyrics of the latter 20th century.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.
Last edited by boo boo; 05-12-2008 at 10:56 PM.
boo boo is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:40 PM   #29 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Uh, none of those are very complex, and the Smiths never really went outside of their comfort zone.
ProggyMan is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:40 PM   #30 (permalink)
Da Hiphopopotamus
 
sweet_nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
The Beatles are better than The Smiths in every concievable way and not just because The Smiths were a bunch of emo kids who constructed some of the most retarded and overrated lyrics of the latter 20th century.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
America does folk, hardcore and mathrock better and that's 90% of what I give 2 shits on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartsengrafs View Post
sweet nothing openly flaunts the fact that he is merely the empty shell of an even more unadmirable member. his loneliness and need for attention bleeds through every letter he types. edit: i would just like to add that i'm ashamed that he's from texas. surely you didn't grow up in texas, did you sweet nothing?
sweet_nothing is offline  
Closed Thread
Page 3 of 10 12 3 45 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.