I dont think I have to point out the irony since Oasis has been making the same album since 1994. Radiohead havent been making the same album since Kid A. Even its sister album didnt even sound that similar to its predecessor and lacked the flow of Kid A. On Hail to the Thief we almost saw the band return to their rock sound of the mid 90's but not quite and In Rainbows for the most part is very seductive and calming.

Yes but Oasis never claimed to be or were ever labelled progressive.

I remember Noel claiming that Dig Out Your Soul would bea step forward and a departure from their britpop sound, and it really wasnt. Also what is Oasis' problem with Radiohead? At least once a month I read something stupid that Noel or his brother said about them, and why does the NME feel the need to make an article about everything Noel says?

I can't comment on Dig Out Your Soul because quite honestly I couldn't care less about it.

And why do they print what they say?

Well your posting it here telling us it's in their paper ain't you?

Job done on the NME's part.

Oasis had two good records and those were the first two. At least Radiohead tries to do something different and the fact that they Kid A was a number one record in America when it went against everything that was "cool" at the time says something.

Oasis is probably legitimately jealous. I mean, I like them, but c'mon, there's no reason for that. They're mad because their fire's gone out and Radiohead is still going strong.

Oh and thanks for the upload, Sweet Nothing.

Hey, remember when them Gallagher boys got attacked on stage at Virgin Fest in Toronto?

Doesn't say that all?
No one would ever even attempt to touch Thom, unless it was for hugs.

I wish I had hugs from Thom.

That's almost as good as this:

Or bottle of urine thrown at Justin Timberlake at SarsStock?
(Which, as much as I don't care for the dude, made me feel really bad...)

That is by far the funniest video I have ever seen. They just walk off stage. haha