Is music dead as of 2008? (hip-hop, indie, rock, albums) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2008, 09:11 AM   #121 (permalink)
nothing
 
mr dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RezZ View Post
You are correct but there is still a good deal of influence technology has on music.

For instance the invention of the Moog (spelling?) synthesizer started an entire new genre of music and brought many more different sounds into play.

You are still correct in saying that it is mental, that is also in my opinion the biggest factor in the creation of new music.

i mostly agree, but the moog has been around since the 60s. while you could get full on moog albums it was much more of a novelty than a start of a new synth based style (i have the moog christmas record hehe). and prior to that you had the dada-ist toying with the idea of anti-art in the 20s (basically a REALLY old school precursor to modern ambient electronic and free jazz when it came to their musical offerings). it really wasn't until the 80s that full on electronic bands really started taking off (as in bands that had 0 traditional rock instruments).

technology will play a factor but it will ALWAYS be about how the musician chooses to use the technology. i remember an interview with martin gore from depeche mode where he made the very valid comment that a lot of people never bothered tweaking the factory presets on their synths. they would simply use what they had as they figured it was supposed to be used, and then wondered why they sounded like plastic. it's the same thing happening to a LOT of rock bands, regardless of their level of success. the prevalent attitude is, i play guitar, drums or bass - they're supposed to be played like a guitar, drum, or bass. so how is that going to sound fresh?

i really think the biggest factor technology has on music right now is that anyone can record and release something to the world now. it's got nothing to do with new gear or instruments and everything to do with how creative an individual truly is.

the only people who think music is dead are the ones who worship celebrity.
__________________
i am the universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1 View Post
I type whicked fast,
mr dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 10:36 AM   #122 (permalink)
Registered Jimmy Rustler
 
Dr_Rez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr dave View Post
i mostly agree, but the moog has been around since the 60s. while you could get full on moog albums it was much more of a novelty than a start of a new synth based style (i have the moog christmas record hehe). and prior to that you had the dada-ist toying with the idea of anti-art in the 20s (basically a REALLY old school precursor to modern ambient electronic and free jazz when it came to their musical offerings). it really wasn't until the 80s that full on electronic bands really started taking off (as in bands that had 0 traditional rock instruments).

technology will play a factor but it will ALWAYS be about how the musician chooses to use the technology. i remember an interview with martin gore from depeche mode where he made the very valid comment that a lot of people never bothered tweaking the factory presets on their synths. they would simply use what they had as they figured it was supposed to be used, and then wondered why they sounded like plastic. it's the same thing happening to a LOT of rock bands, regardless of their level of success. the prevalent attitude is, i play guitar, drums or bass - they're supposed to be played like a guitar, drum, or bass. so how is that going to sound fresh?

i really think the biggest factor technology has on music right now is that anyone can record and release something to the world now. it's got nothing to do with new gear or instruments and everything to do with how creative an individual truly is.

the only people who think music is dead are the ones who worship celebrity.
Agree with you 100%
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*
Dr_Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 11:14 AM   #123 (permalink)
nothing
 
mr dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RezZ View Post
Agree with you 100%
while i'm flattered if this continues this forum will get really boring really quick hehehe

oh yeah - frusciante = effing awesome.
__________________
i am the universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1 View Post
I type whicked fast,
mr dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 11:28 AM   #124 (permalink)
Registered Jimmy Rustler
 
Dr_Rez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr dave View Post
while i'm flattered if this continues this forum will get really boring really quick hehehe

oh yeah - frusciante = effing awesome.
Haha yes, sorry o agree with you wholeheartedly again.

I finally got Slane and hyde park on CD's. The solo's during those two shows blow me away. He has changed so much from his ealier works.
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*
Dr_Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 11:36 AM   #125 (permalink)
nothing
 
mr dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
Default

hehehe haven't actually paid much attention to the peppers in a long time. i just can't get into their stuff as much as i used to. his first solo disc still blows me away almost 15 years later.

i'm just waiting for flea to finally get off his butt and whip out that guest filled solo disc he's been mulling over for a while now where he only plans to play trumpet.
__________________
i am the universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1 View Post
I type whicked fast,
mr dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 12:13 PM   #126 (permalink)
Bancount: 3 ^_______^
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 911
Default

if music is communication (as many here and other places argue), hip-hop is quite possibly the best form of music


everyone here has such predictable and pigeonholed opinions of music.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by monarc View Post
i will support the evil path of metal
www.myspace.com/arqon
www.myspace.com/xlaststrawx
enemyat_thesix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 01:37 PM   #127 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enemyat_thesix View Post
everyone here has such predictable and pigeonholed opinions of music.
And what makes you stand out oh wise one?
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 01:38 PM   #128 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Nice to know you feel that way...How does Hip Hop communicate more effectively than any other genre?
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 01:46 PM   #129 (permalink)
daddy don't
 
Molecules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: the Wastes
Posts: 2,577
Default

i can dig that. hip hop at it's best is documentary, alot of waste gangsta rap probably took some artistic licence or whatever though. It's just words over beats, you can't get any more direct than that if you're trying to communicate a point. It's not restricted to realism though, extended metaphors, surrealism, it's all good...
__________________

[SIZE="1"]Eff em
tumble her
Molecules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 01:46 PM   #130 (permalink)
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
Animal Collective innovative ?



They just sound like Jonathan Donahue era Flaming Lips.
Wow, I thought I was the only one who noticed that. Old Flaming Lips is good, but their new stuff just blows everything out of the water. And no, as with many Indie bands, I haven't bought into this Animal Collective hype.

Many of todays hot Indie bands are merely copying older bands, but they imitate them so poorly that people consider them to be innovative. Modest Mouse for example were just trying to copy other Indie bands like Pixies and Built to Spill, but they sucked at it so much that they somehow managed to sound original.

If theres one modern Indie band I give two shits about, it would be My Morning Jacket. Even with the obvious classic rock influences they manage to sound very original and different. Add to that they can actually play their instruments and their albums don't sound like they were pieced together in 5 minutes by a deaf person, for an Indie band thats a breath of fresh air as far as I'm concerned.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.

Last edited by boo boo; 04-05-2008 at 02:10 PM.
boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.