Best Albums Pre-60 - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2008, 06:03 AM   #11 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

MB's Top Albums Pre-60 - Rate Your Music

Okay, I'm very content with the top 10 and I could go and move everything into a better order but if you guys suggest number positions for certain things and swap arounds it would be so much easier.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 12:34 PM   #12 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

This only problem with pre 60s music is that a lot of great music wasn't released on albums. I'd say people like Son House & Robert Johnson were hugely influential in the pre 60s period yet neither man had any albums until compilations came out in the 60s. Even though a lot of their work dates back to the 20s & 30s
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 04:33 PM   #13 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
This only problem with pre 60s music is that a lot of great music wasn't released on albums. I'd say people like Son House & Robert Johnson were hugely influential in the pre 60s period yet neither man had any albums until compilations came out in the 60s. Even though a lot of their work dates back to the 20s & 30s
Eh, absolutely. Hell, even in the SIXTIES the LP was still not really the dominant format, in all truth. It had only really become entrenched as the dominant format by the early 70s, though of course the late 60s were what brought it on and changed the shape of what an album could be, what with LPs like Sgt Pepper and Abbey Road and of course the many contributions of other bands etc..

As far as it not being the dominant format in that era, it's telling enough that as many as 10 Beatles singles for example didn't even appear on any of their albums. On top of that, look at the disparity between UK and US releases concerning their first four albums. They had completely different names and rather different track listings. Even more striking is the point that on those first four albums there were around 20 covers. The music industry was just a completely different animal back then. Everything really changed for good by the onset of the 70s.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 08:38 PM   #14 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

So do we want to include compilations than from artists who recorded in that time?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.