Worst band on earth? (house, punk, members, quote, bands)

riseagainstrocks · 10-15-2004, 07:07 PM

Dashboard Confessional. Giving crying fodder to teenage girls since whenever-the-f*ck he learned that whining into a microphone got him money

Slayer247_666 · 10-15-2004, 08:56 PM

The worst band ever has to be the Beatles. Yeah, they were a big influence back in the 60's, but thier songs are way to mellow and are full of wussy lyrics!

penelly · 10-16-2004, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Junior Saint

Blink 182 rule!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Totally agree on this one.. guess its a matter of taste..

jibber · 10-16-2004, 03:45 PM

^^ wow, I don't think there's a single comment on this board that I disagree more with. ok this reply is gonna be long so bear with me.

when the beatles came out, they revolutionized music. before their time, we had what, sinatra as the big music icon of the period. so think of what they had to work with in terms of inflences and inspiration. nothing in the time period in which they broke out on to the scene was even close to what they were doing. now on to the "wussy lyrics" comment, which shows nothing more than the fact that you simply don't understand te majority of their lyrics. they dealt with major issues in their lyrics, hypocricy within the british monarchy and the church and its role in the state for example, in elenoar rigby. surprised? if you'd listened to the lyrics and understood the times and the circumstances in which they were written, you wouldn't be. I don't have time to explain and analyize all of their lyrics for you, but I'd suggest having another listen, and actually try to break beneath the surface of what the meaning seems to be. back to the "too mellow" comment, you can't compare their music to the types of music we have now, it's a completely different time period, it just doesn't work. they completely broke the mold when they came out, and anyone who says that they weren't talented musicians really don't know what they're talking about. look at the music ringo plays, anyone who plays drums will tell you it's difficult, plus singing at the same time. same with george harrison. ok, i think I'm done for now, I could go on if you need further convincing, believe me, I have plenty more arguments where those came from.

pompom · 10-18-2004, 07:00 AM

blink182 suck!!!
1. all the songs sound the same.
2. the vocals are rubbish
3. the videos look ***
4. the music have similar rubbish beats
and finally
5. they suck!!!!

duckcatmouse · 10-18-2004, 06:57 PM

i would have to say a lot of stuff that is played on the radio isnt very good. but the band i hate the most would have to fall under the slipknot disturbed godsmack genre(aka craptastic bands)

suicide_angel · 10-18-2004, 07:30 PM

worst single artist eva would b nicky webster as quoted by bel_rox

jibber · 10-19-2004, 12:28 AM

again people, could we try to explain WHY the bands are supposedly crap so the thread isn't completely useless?

Serotony · 10-20-2004, 06:20 PM

there are quite a good number of bad ones, but uhm, worst?

nickelback for ear´s sake! every song they write is just crap, no good lyrical content, old, wasted melodies.. ah, it couldn´t be worse.

*honourable mentions:

hoobastank ("the reason" is so freaking annoying that it hurts. they´ve gone too commercial and, even tho that is not always a synonym for less quality, in most cases it is. and this is one of those cases. period.)

busted (haha. no comments)

good charlotte (do i have to explain it? i don´t think i could find the proper words.)

staind (once again, it´s all about the way they write. it´s so old news that it´´s irritating)

puddle of mudd (i admit that i like "she f_cking hates me", for the fun of it, but other than that... there´s absolutely nothing there worth to listen to)

MacDaddyX12 · 10-22-2004, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serotony

there are quite a good number of bad ones, but uhm, worst?

nickelback for ear´s sake! every song they write is just crap, no good lyrical content, old, wasted melodies.. ah, it couldn´t be worse.

I SECOND THAT NICKELBACK MOTION...they truly are one of the worst

10-15-2004, 07:07 PM	#31 (permalink)
riseagainstrocks Music Addict Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: DC Posts: 3,320	Dashboard Confessional. Giving crying fodder to teenage girls since whenever-the-f*ck he learned that whining into a microphone got him money __________________ One note timeless, came out of nowhere...

10-16-2004, 03:45 PM	#34 (permalink)
jibber Freeskier Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople... Posts: 1,536	^^ wow, I don't think there's a single comment on this board that I disagree more with. ok this reply is gonna be long so bear with me. when the beatles came out, they revolutionized music. before their time, we had what, sinatra as the big music icon of the period. so think of what they had to work with in terms of inflences and inspiration. nothing in the time period in which they broke out on to the scene was even close to what they were doing. now on to the "wussy lyrics" comment, which shows nothing more than the fact that you simply don't understand te majority of their lyrics. they dealt with major issues in their lyrics, hypocricy within the british monarchy and the church and its role in the state for example, in elenoar rigby. surprised? if you'd listened to the lyrics and understood the times and the circumstances in which they were written, you wouldn't be. I don't have time to explain and analyize all of their lyrics for you, but I'd suggest having another listen, and actually try to break beneath the surface of what the meaning seems to be. back to the "too mellow" comment, you can't compare their music to the types of music we have now, it's a completely different time period, it just doesn't work. they completely broke the mold when they came out, and anyone who says that they weren't talented musicians really don't know what they're talking about. look at the music ringo plays, anyone who plays drums will tell you it's difficult, plus singing at the same time. same with george harrison. ok, i think I'm done for now, I could go on if you need further convincing, believe me, I have plenty more arguments where those came from. __________________ What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road. William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass. HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER

10-19-2004, 12:28 AM	#38 (permalink)
jibber Freeskier Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople... Posts: 1,536	again people, could we try to explain WHY the bands are supposedly crap so the thread isn't completely useless? __________________ What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road. William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass. HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER

10-20-2004, 06:20 PM	#39 (permalink)
Serotony Groupie Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Portugal Posts: 10	there are quite a good number of bad ones, but uhm, worst? nickelback for ear´s sake! every song they write is just crap, no good lyrical content, old, wasted melodies.. ah, it couldn´t be worse. *honourable mentions: hoobastank ("the reason" is so freaking annoying that it hurts. they´ve gone too commercial and, even tho that is not always a synonym for less quality, in most cases it is. and this is one of those cases. period.) busted (haha. no comments) good charlotte (do i have to explain it? i don´t think i could find the proper words.) staind (once again, it´s all about the way they write. it´s so old news that it´´s irritating) puddle of mudd (i admit that i like "she f_cking hates me", for the fun of it, but other than that... there´s absolutely nothing there worth to listen to) __________________ I don´t want to live forever But as long as i do I´d love to live for real

10-15-2004, 08:56 PM	#32 (permalink)
Slayer247_666 Groupie Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 10	The worst band ever has to be the Beatles. Yeah, they were a big influence back in the 60's, but thier songs are way to mellow and are full of wussy lyrics!

10-18-2004, 07:00 AM	#35 (permalink)
pompom Music Addict Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 47	blink182 suck!!! 1. all the songs sound the same. 2. the vocals are rubbish 3. the videos look *** 4. the music have similar rubbish beats and finally 5. they suck!!!!

10-18-2004, 06:57 PM	#36 (permalink)
duckcatmouse Groupie Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 16	i would have to say a lot of stuff that is played on the radio isnt very good. but the band i hate the most would have to fall under the slipknot disturbed godsmack genre(aka craptastic bands)

10-18-2004, 07:30 PM	#37 (permalink)
suicide_angel Groupie Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: u don't need 2 know Posts: 4	worst single artist eva would b nicky webster as quoted by bel_rox