The Beatles (soundtrack, singer, bass, jazz, metal)

boo boo · 12-27-2007, 10:21 PM

I know guitarists. And Lennon was by no means a better or greater guitarist than Harrison.

fanofthefab4 · 12-27-2007, 10:27 PM

Stupid stupid Stupid thats what you are and everything you have said is! You are a total ignoramous and I'm done trying to get through to you or anybody else like you on here!

sleepy jack · 12-27-2007, 10:28 PM

Why because I've been doing more than copying off wikipedia and googling information for my argument? George Harrison was a great guitarist, better than both Paul or John you don't even have to go digging through all the Beatles material to see that just listen to All Things Must Pass.

~~Gates_of_Iscariot~~ · 12-27-2007, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fanofthefab4

I said that Wikipedia was only one of many sources etc! I gave a lot of other strong great sources of information besides Wikipedia and almost all of my information came from other better sources so no I didn't fail anything except to get through to your biased close mind!

lol
i have 100 gigs of music you probably have never heard of

TheCaster · 12-29-2007, 08:17 PM

the fanoffab dude has been officially pwned... anyhoo.. like boo says it wasnt JUST lennon although he is a beast everyone contributed and the beatles wouldntve exsisted and been as great as they were without the other guys

Urban Hat€monger ? · 12-29-2007, 08:19 PM

I miss him already. I love it when people come on here with the sole purpose of 'educating' me.

kemoryan · 12-30-2007, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fiddle_Tunes19

Meet The Beatles....good choice

I second that. Its the only album I can't just spend hours listening to :S

British_pharaoh · 12-30-2007, 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgd85

thats like saying "whats the ugliest thing about jessica simpson". i dont think i could choose if i wanted to.

her face

she's vile

great bod though

Rainard Jalen · 12-31-2007, 06:51 AM

But the thing is, it's SO very inaccurate to say that John Lennon WAS the Beatles that it's just beyond ridiculous. There is so much proof that this idea is nonsense that it hardly begs mention. I mean, for starters, it should be enough of an indication that such claims are total hogwash that the most recorded song of ALL TIME, Yesterday (1965), was solely a McCartney composition.

In the early days, John and Paul used to write together in an extremely close collaborative manner. John said in a Playboy Magazine interview in 1980:

"We wrote a lot of stuff together, one on one, eyeball to eyeball. Like in 'I Want to Hold Your Hand,' I remember when we got the chord that made the song. We were in Jane Asher's house, downstairs in the cellar playing on the piano at the same time. And we had, 'Oh you-u-u/ got that something...' And Paul hits this chord, and I turn to him and say, 'That's it!' I said, 'Do that again!' In those days, we really used to absolutely write like that—both playing into each other's noses."

As time progressed and they began to write more and more separately, we still observe that their contributions to the albums were more or less even, the differences being marked in style.

In terms of their UK number #1 hits, Paul wrote I believe six on his own, whereas John wrote five (the rest are generally believed to be collaborations).

There is really no way it could be possible to claim that Lennon was any more important to the Beatles' success than McCartney.

Flow · 01-11-2008, 09:47 PM

Cant beat em... discuss

12-29-2007, 08:17 PM	#485 (permalink)
TheCaster Music Rapist Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Somewhere in the U.S Posts: 400	the fanoffab dude has been officially pwned... anyhoo.. like boo says it wasnt JUST lennon although he is a beast everyone contributed and the beatles wouldntve exsisted and been as great as they were without the other guys __________________ A soul in tension thats learning to fly Condition grounded but determined to try Cant keep my eyes from the circling skies Tongue-tied and twisted just an earth-bound misfit

12-29-2007, 08:19 PM	#486 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	I miss him already. I love it when people come on here with the sole purpose of 'educating' me. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

01-11-2008, 09:47 PM	#490 (permalink)
Flow Groupie Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1	The Beatles Cant beat em... discuss

View Poll Results:
	0	0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

12-27-2007, 10:27 PM	#482 (permalink)
fanofthefab4 Groupie Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 23	Stupid stupid Stupid thats what you are and everything you have said is! You are a total ignoramous and I'm done trying to get through to you or anybody else like you on here!

12-31-2007, 06:51 AM	#489 (permalink)
Rainard Jalen Music Addict Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,221	But the thing is, it's SO very inaccurate to say that John Lennon WAS the Beatles that it's just beyond ridiculous. There is so much proof that this idea is nonsense that it hardly begs mention. I mean, for starters, it should be enough of an indication that such claims are total hogwash that the most recorded song of ALL TIME, Yesterday (1965), was solely a McCartney composition. In the early days, John and Paul used to write together in an extremely close collaborative manner. John said in a Playboy Magazine interview in 1980: "We wrote a lot of stuff together, one on one, eyeball to eyeball. Like in 'I Want to Hold Your Hand,' I remember when we got the chord that made the song. We were in Jane Asher's house, downstairs in the cellar playing on the piano at the same time. And we had, 'Oh you-u-u/ got that something...' And Paul hits this chord, and I turn to him and say, 'That's it!' I said, 'Do that again!' In those days, we really used to absolutely write like that—both playing into each other's noses." As time progressed and they began to write more and more separately, we still observe that their contributions to the albums were more or less even, the differences being marked in style. In terms of their UK number #1 hits, Paul wrote I believe six on his own, whereas John wrote five (the rest are generally believed to be collaborations). There is really no way it could be possible to claim that Lennon was any more important to the Beatles' success than McCartney.