![]() |
Quote:
Also, their cover of "Superstar" is amazing. It might be the best thing they've ever done and I'm a huge fan of their catalogue. It's obsess-worthy, in my opinion. |
Yeah 100% and Superstar were the ones i pondered upon.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
thanks for all the suggestions, I'll get crackin' |
|
I get bored by Mogwai. I don't know what it is. I'm fine listening to Stereolab, Godspeed, Explosions, Sigur Ros etc but they are just so ****ing comatose.
I think everyone needs a little dose of Mercury Rev now and then. =) |
Quote:
|
I said I listened to Godspeed.
It's not the lack of hooks, it's really the lack of emotion or album presence. I've listened to a few Mogwai albums all the way through, and they really don't do anything. It's the same reason I don't like Kid A. It doesn't really do anything, just pretty much meanders around for forty minutes. |
Oh, did I say something violently offensive? Sorry, won't share my opinions next time.
At one point, I listened to other people rather than my own instincts, but since then, I've come to realize that I enjoy Amnesiac far, far more. |
No one's music taste is good OR bad. It's just what they like. People who like teenybopping **** annoy me, yes, but people in general annoy me. It doesn't make them good or bad, no one's taste is any better that anyone elses'. Everyone has there own individual perception of EVERYTHING, not just music. How can anyone be better or worse, how can a TASTE be any better or worse, when everything relies on subjection and perception? I don't understand why people argue - it's as if you're trying to work another person around to you're opinion, and that will never happen, people have their own, especially on a site like this. Debates are lovely and intelligent, you can even be creative with them, like Urban (example "10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles"). But. Random arguments dodging others individual tastes? Rather pointless.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.