|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-28-2012, 06:37 PM | #1276 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 322
|
Neither. They did a Christmas special in the UK back in the late 70s.
Another Day is a good one.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
08-28-2012, 06:47 PM | #1277 (permalink) |
The Music Guru.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
|
He can hit all the notes but he can't sing them properly. You're only a good singer if you can hit the notes, no wavering, have good vocal quality, and a clear tone. Thom is lacking the last 3 criteria. So, no, he does not have a good singing voice.
|
08-28-2012, 06:51 PM | #1278 (permalink) | |
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
He has an octave range greater than some instruments.
__________________
Quote:
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
|
08-28-2012, 06:53 PM | #1279 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
|
Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, BD... is there nothing to be said for expression and what you're able to convey with a voice? Why is "good" based in on technicality? Surely it's as subjective as whether or not a piece of music is "good"? Nobody's ever seriously tried to dispute subjectivity here before...
|
|