Unpopular Music Opinions - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2014, 03:20 PM   #9441 (permalink)
cooler commie than elph
 
Isbjørn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In a hole, help
Posts: 2,811
Default

Sorry, but...

Isbjørn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2014, 05:35 PM   #9442 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,483
Default

Elton John has some bangers.
James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2014, 10:13 PM   #9443 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
I always hear people say the same thing about Elton John. The thing is Elton's music made more of an impact at his peak (70'ss) along with his performances. His music is probably not as artistic anymore but he was able to reinvent his sound. Billy's music did not have the same impact
But artistically, not relying on chart positions or sale numbers his one song, "I Guess That's Why They Call It the Blues," is better than some of his songs in the 70s like Crocodile Rock or Benny and the Jets. It's throwback to early Rock n Roll but with more modern instrumentation and recording equipment, in my opinion it's in the same vein of John Lennon's Rock and Roll or The Honeydrippers' cover-songs albums. I don't know if Elton John was less popular or more popular in the 80s. I just like that one song.


Billy Joel was part of a number of artist that had hits in the 80s but in the 70s were more a part of Album Orient Rock radio. (I don't know if anyone would consider them cross-over artist for going from AOR to Pop radio.) But it seems he did better in the 80s. He had a two Top 10 in the 70s both reach 3rd, and some songs didn't chart that high at all. In the 80s he had three songs that reach #1 and six others that broke the Top 10. Billy Joel did well for himself in the 80s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
I always thought Billy Joel was similar to Phil Collins. They both had some good material but then they also have their share of mediocre material. Not to mention the good material did not make much of an impact. I think they are properly rated.
I don't how to take that that "Not to mention the good material did not make much of an impact."

I don't know how you or other members rate their music, and that is generally a subjective opinion. They can however be rated on how successful they are through sales. And if that is any gauge then I think their music did make an impact somewhere... it certainty did for the record companies. They are (or were at some time) the "6th best-selling" and "22nd most successful" artists out there.

Quote:
Joel has become the sixth best-selling recording artist and the third best-selling solo artist in the United States.
Billy Joel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
In 2008, Collins was ranked the 22nd most successful artist on the "The Billboard Hot 100 All-Time Top Artists"
Phil Collins - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2014, 10:55 PM   #9444 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Ninetales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: livin wild
Posts: 2,179
Default

impact/influence is the most misused terminology that's used to describe music. applying narrow scopes to a very spacious art.

not to mention influence =/= quality

I really hate the term at this point tbh, as, generally speaking, the points that it is used for are poor ones
Ninetales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 04:36 AM   #9445 (permalink)
Trolier Than Thou
 
Forward To Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninetales View Post
impact/influence is the most misused terminology that's used to describe music. applying narrow scopes to a very spacious art.

not to mention influence =/= quality

I really hate the term at this point tbh, as, generally speaking, the points that it is used for are poor ones
Impacting more people means that you're technically a more prolific artist, while quality, especially in music, is very subjective. I agree that you can usually within reason explain the differences between quality music and music that is clearly subpar, and that's usually what the argument is. There are some devil's advocates out there who'll nickel and dime you about music "quality" in ways that you can't possibly agree with unless you have a business degree.

As far as the music industry is concerned, Lady Gaga is well on her way to becoming the greatest recording artist of all time.
Forward To Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 03:18 PM   #9446 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Ninetales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: livin wild
Posts: 2,179
Default

I was more getting at that who you are influencing/impacting is dependent on many different variables, most of which are ignored when theyre being used. "impact on music" is a very dumb and vague statement, but one that ive heard more times than I should have (aka greater than none). Music isn't a tree that's attached to a bunch of branches, but a forest where some of the trees aren't in the same vicinity.
Ninetales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 03:56 PM   #9447 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
That'll happen. Get enough radioplay and the Trollhearts of the world are sure to buy one of your albums. He does paint pretty pink houses though.
I did. It was called the lonesome something. Road? No. Highway? No. Crow? No. Jubilee? No. Or was it? Ju-bi-lee. Sounds about right. It wasn't great though; I think it had about two or three decent tracks, and the rest was really sub-par.

Incidentally, is he in the record books or something for being one of the few artistes who used three names during his career?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hat€monger ? View Post
Led Zeppelin were bigger than Dumpy's Rusty Nuts
Dumpy's Rusty Nuts are bigger than mine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
Billy Joel, Elton John, & Michael Jackson = boring music I don't ever want to listen to.
"The stranger" is one phenomenal album, and surely you can't fault "Goodnight Saigon"? And doesn't everyone love "Piano man"?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 05:02 PM   #9448 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post

"The stranger" is one phenomenal album, and surely you can't fault "Goodnight Saigon"? And doesn't everyone love "Piano man"?
Not this guy. But hey, I thought it was crazy that somebody didn't like TMR or Zappa so I guess we're even.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pet_Sounds View Post
Have you heard this one?
Meh, the strings were cool but the rest was kinda bland. I don't really like his voice.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 05:17 PM   #9449 (permalink)
Out of Place
 
Black Francis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: in an abstract house
Posts: 4,111
Default

Speaking of Michael jackson, has anyone here seen Captain EO?

i recently discovered this vid and im kinda shocked i never heard any reference to it until recently.
__________________
"Hey Kids you got to meet the MIGHTY PIXIES!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbRbCtIgW3A
Black Francis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 05:40 PM   #9450 (permalink)
Trolier Than Thou
 
Forward To Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninetales View Post
I was more getting at that who you are influencing/impacting is dependent on many different variables, most of which are ignored when theyre being used. "impact on music" is a very dumb and vague statement, but one that ive heard more times than I should have (aka greater than none). Music isn't a tree that's attached to a bunch of branches, but a forest where some of the trees aren't in the same vicinity.
Well impact on music is something that's tangible that you can make an argument for pretty easily. There are statistics on that type of thing, while you absolutely will not be able to find the same things when explaining actual quality.

Basically, it's a safer argument to say that popular=better. It's inaccurate, because there's not rational basis for popularity impacting music taste, yet it's obvious that a lot of people do listen to music for the sake of popularity. Because of this, your argument is going to ring true to more people than if you explained in detail why "Master Of Puppets" is better than "Louie Louie".
Forward To Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.