|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-10-2008, 01:51 PM | #911 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Absolutely not.
|
05-10-2008, 02:09 PM | #913 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Um. Low?
|
05-10-2008, 02:14 PM | #914 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Not lame. And I'm talking about their popularity or their massive influence. They were just a great band, anyone who is familiar with their work and calls them lame, I don't know how thats even possible.
Yeah, but when he started out his music was a bit more on the psychedelic side, before making his transition to glam rock. |
05-10-2008, 02:28 PM | #915 (permalink) | |
one big soul
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,096
|
Quote:
I don't give a shit about what they did for music, or how everyone else likes them, their music is lame in general to me. The Who made way better music. |
|
05-10-2008, 02:30 PM | #916 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
|
How can an opinion be objective? How can a personal non-science based thought or feeling be objective? That would be like having an objective hate or an objective gladness. It just isn't really something which holds the properties of falsifiable factuality and thus isn't really objective in nature.
|
05-10-2008, 03:29 PM | #917 (permalink) | |
Reformed Jackass
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
|
Quote:
|
|
|