Unpopular Music Opinions - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2011, 12:00 AM   #6461 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Captain Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: in a boat with your girlfriend
Posts: 274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metal Connoisseur View Post
I've always held the opinion that Bono can't sing a lick, and that his singing typically sounds forced and irks me to no end. Does anyone else feel this way? And Nickelback is just awful. No redeeming quality about that band.
no way bono is a good singer
Captain Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 12:53 AM   #6462 (permalink)
Buzz Killjoy
 
BastardofYoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,692
Default

U2 only has one song I love.... if only they did more like this song:


This song is the only thing in the way of not caring about them at all.. One of the best rock songs of all-time as far as I am concerned.
__________________
last.fm

‎"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.
BastardofYoung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 02:30 AM   #6463 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

I've always liked Pride (In the name of love) by U2, but other stuff hasn't appealed to me as much. Another song from my favourite nostalgia year 84.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 02:35 AM   #6464 (permalink)
Rocket Appliances
 
DoctorSoft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,335
Default

Bastard I feel your pain haha. Although my friends mom went to high school with them and she said Chad was a dip****.
DoctorSoft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 02:42 AM   #6465 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BastardofYoung View Post
I like The Stones, but I find The Beatles to be the better of the 2 personally. While yes, both bands had an image, I always felt like The Stones were more focused on the image, while The Beatles were focused more on the art. Both have their place, but I think years from now when new generations look back on what was happening at the time, and a lot of the stuff we know now will be largely forgotten by anybody not a music historian... The Beatles will go down as more important.

But I won't be alive to find out first hand, so I won't know..
Don't worry, they already have gone down as more important.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 03:50 AM   #6466 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BastardofYoung View Post
Well, I believe all styles of music have some sort of image attatched to it. Be it rap, punk, rock, metal, country, classical, blues and so on... there is some sort of image... which is fine, but it, atleast to me, becomes a matter of... does the image overpower the art. Looking at blues, I would Blues Brothers are an example of image over art, they dress blues, but play total generic soulless versions of... while some may say they are great, i say they are about the image they put out, and hold em to it, and see em as just entertainment... granted they are essentially a comedy act on top, so maybe that is not the best example to use, but still makes my point.

The Beatles, yeah, started out as cute stuff that blended into the British Invasion scene, but overtime I think they grew much more into an artistic band than that of The Stones, they were always growing and experimenting and trying new things.. while The Stones, to me atleast, just kinda remained the same, only trying to evolve when another band was doing something.

The Stones I love, they were the bad boys, they had that element to em, that seemed more dangerous and out there than the cuteness of The Beatles. I say The Beatles were "i wanna hold your hand" and the Stones were just "i wanna f*ck you". Beatles were the nice boys you took home to mom and dad, Stones were the bad ass boys yer dad would of kicked the s*it out of... and I like that in rock n roll, do not get me wrong.

In the end who is better is personal preference, really no right answer as to which was the better band... i just feel The Beatles were always growing, while The Stones seemed to be happy in the same place.
If that were the case, then none of the bands mentioned above could touch the image of the band Kiss or Michael Jackson. Does that musically make Kiss or whoever? A better talented band or genre than that of the Stones or Beatles? Image is nothing more than propaganda and media statistics.
One of the only few cases of where image over art (as you state). That I can think of with any viability that verses the music, would be the career of Milli Vanilli. But in most instances, my point being is that image usually holds very little, if "No" barring at all on the majority of most bands actual music and style.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 06:40 AM   #6467 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer View Post
But in most instances, my point being is that image usually holds very little, if "No" barring at all on the majority of most bands actual music and style.
I'm pretty sure you and Bastard said the same thing but I could be wrong
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 10:56 AM   #6468 (permalink)
Your Ad Here
 
Electrophonic Tonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Twilight Zone
Posts: 876
Default

A Tribute to Jack Johnson is better than Bitches Brew
Electrophonic Tonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 10:58 AM   #6469 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrophonic Tonic View Post
A Tribute to Jack Johnson is better than Bitches Brew
And On the Corner is better than Jack Johnson
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 11:09 AM   #6470 (permalink)
Cardboard Box Realtor
 
LoathsomePete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hobb's End
Posts: 7,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BastardofYoung View Post
man, you would fit into Alberta if you like Nickleback. I am not a fan, and I have been threatened with being killed by people here for saying anything even remotely bad.

I remember my boss was friends with them, and I said to somebody that they suck one day, and he came out on our hour break, gave me the tough guy shoulder and said "what the f*ck did you say about my friends".... I said "nothing... they could be the nicest people in the world as far as I know, but musically they are awful"

People here take it seriously, cause they are "local boys" and think they have to protect them from harms way at all times.

I have lost count of how many times I will be talking music to a girl I think is hot, and get into my hatred for Nickleback... and then saying "okay, sorry... so who is your favorite band", just to hear an angry "Nickleback!"

Nickleback through are the embodiment of god awful benality in all that music. Mindless music, with boring riffs and dreadfully stupid sexist lyrics. F*ck em.
That's when you tell to act like real Albertans and listen to The Smalls instead.
LoathsomePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.