|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-23-2010, 04:16 PM | #2992 (permalink) | |
FUNky
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808 sometimes I don't thrill you sometimes I think I'll kill you just don't let me fuck up will you 'cause when I need a friend it's still you |
|
06-23-2010, 10:59 PM | #2993 (permalink) |
Untalented Drummer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sussex, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,900
|
I'm all for the quality over quantity approach myself, too... there's nothing worse than 70 to 80 minutes of constantly droning, boring music with nothing to sustain your eagerly awaiting ears...
__________________
"If you're like me, then it's possible you're a clone generated from my stolen DNA. I suggest you turn yourself in for destruction immediately" - Shaun Micallef. |
06-23-2010, 11:59 PM | #2994 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Oh great you're not a Slint fan either.
|
06-24-2010, 12:24 AM | #2996 (permalink) | |
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
70's Rock n Roll is the pinnacle of modern music and the recording industry in general. Don't get me wrong they was a lot of junk and crappy stuff recorded in the 70's (like there is today) but it all was forgotten by time - thank goodness. To get music as great as 70's music one has to travel back time to JS Bach.
__________________
Quote:
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
|
06-24-2010, 12:39 AM | #2998 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: -_-_-_-_~__~-~_-`_`-~_-`-~-~
Posts: 1,276
|
If I remember my music history courses correctly, Bach still played in the time where music was forced into a certain structure (Baroque maybe?). Beethoven/Mozart times were much more unrestrained/etc. and allowed for much more artistic expression. Then again, you could pour 'musical subjectivity' all over this and still say that Bach played in greater times, but I'd still argue otherwise.
I still wouldn't claim the 70s were the pinnacle. |
06-24-2010, 12:40 AM | #2999 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Back in the 70s bands really experimented.
Today kids throw around the term to describe sh*tty screamo bands because they supplement a brief piano part in all the unbearably whiny bullsh*t. If I'm coming off as a cranky elitist... that's because I am. |
06-24-2010, 12:43 AM | #3000 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: -_-_-_-_~__~-~_-`_`-~_-`-~-~
Posts: 1,276
|
Yes, but just because now isn't the pinnacle, and they 'experimented' per se in the seventies, why would that make it the pinnacle? It's a good argument as to why now isn't the pinnacle, but I don't think it justifies the 70s being it, considering how long music has been 'evolving'. Just trying to wrap my head around that.
|
|