|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-02-2010, 06:47 PM | #2381 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
Pretty much every genre you mentioned for the 80's is ****e, save maybe some shoegazing **** The Strokes All Things Must Pass = one of the most overrated albums ever. And this is coming from a Beatle fanatic. Every single Lennon solo project (excluding those done with Yoko) is better. Paul has many classic solo albums, ignoring some of his 80's stuff... Ringo had an understanded if extremely listenable solo career, much like his Beatles tracks Radiohead is for people who slit their wrists and are scared of a good rhythm. A few sad/forlorn songs is alright to keep a career interesting but who wants to be the Wes Craven of rock and roll? Mind you that I think some of their work is fantastic, namely their first two albums, but I'm more into uplifting music Stairway is a pile of crap? That's a laugh |
|
06-02-2010, 06:58 PM | #2382 (permalink) | |
love will tear you apart
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 5,107
|
Quote:
Sorry to drift into film from unpopular musical opinions. |
|
06-02-2010, 07:04 PM | #2384 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
As I said I'm making a point about the 80's. I'm sure with some thought there are probably 10-15 artists/bands who were good in the 80's, but compared to any other decade, including the 50's, that's friggin' pitiful. Obviously the 00's were mostly crap but at least we didn't have to bear through that atrocious 80's production... the same old synths, the same old snares, the same cheesy reverb... and that spanned genres. The Smiths, there's another good 80's group. "A Certain Romance", "When The Sun Goes Down", "Crying Lightning", "Brianstorm", etc. etc. Great band. And there's more Solo George tried to be too complex structurally and melodically in his solo stuff. Put me to sleep. If I want to listen to art rock I'll... no, I just won't. "Radiohead is for people who slit their wrists and are scared of a good rhythm. A few sad/forlorn songs is alright to keep a career interesting but who wants to be the Wes Craven of rock and roll? Mind you that I think some of their work is fantastic, namely their first two albums, but I'm more into uplifting music" <--from earlier post The Beatles are number one, Zeppelin is number two... don't see how that's not obvious lol I really have nothing to say against Dylan. Too many good songs/projects. He might be a tad overrated in the fact that SO many people suck his **** but other than that he's amazing Queen is crap? That's a laugh Modern indie rock is for hipsters with no rhythm. Full stop |
|
06-02-2010, 07:07 PM | #2387 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
I'd be able to take that opinion more seriously if you didn't have Led Zeppelin listed as one of the best bands ever.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
06-02-2010, 07:12 PM | #2389 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
Nothing at all
Perfectly decent cock rock band One of the best of all time? Nah.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|