Unpopular Music Opinions - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2019, 06:36 PM   #16491 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I've never actually known what the general opinion was of their discography.
Depends on the version of the band.

Fripp is the only constant.
My fave is the Fripp/Bruford/Levin/Belew line-up and their Red, Yellow, and Blue albums.

Discipline being the best.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 01:35 PM   #16492 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
They were cool with charging top dollar for their tickets, they just went after Ticketmaster for tacking on fees that usually amount to an extra 5 dollars on the ticket with some fees being as high as 15 dollars. If it wasn't a legitimate legal battle I'd call it a publicity stunt to everymanify Pearl Jam to the public.
thats a pretty maximalistic approach.. nobody did anything about arena ticket prices but pearl jam who did something, didnt do enough (cuz they didnt cut their share.) doesnt make sense.
about yr 2nd point: it WAS a legit legal battle [and i understand you agree that it was(?)] so whats the rest about the publicity stunt?

if you want publicity/revolution cred you play a free tibet concert, you dont start beef with the practical monopoly of arranging arena concerts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
Fugazi kept it 100% I think

$5 iirc
i have a great respect for fugazi's ethos but i think its irrelevant here. Pearl Jam must've sold >15.000.000 records when they began the ticketmaster thing. it is a diferrent league.
ziggywas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 01:44 PM   #16493 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggywas View Post
thats a pretty maximalistic approach.. nobody did anything about arena ticket prices but pearl jam who did something, didnt do enough (cuz they didnt cut their share.) doesnt make sense.
They did everything about their high ticket prices except for cutting the price of their tickets.

Quote:
about yr 2nd point: it WAS a legit legal battle [and i understand you agree that it was(?)] so whats the rest about the publicity stunt?

if you want publicity/revolution cred you play a free tibet concert, you dont start beef with the practical monopoly of arranging arena concerts.
Both can be tactics for publicity. Pointing at big bad ticketmaster for the cost of their tickets when PJ is still in control of 95% of the ticket costs outside of ticketmaster fees definitely has the air of a decision made for publicity. If you don't see it, you don't see it I guess.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 02:12 PM   #16494 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
They did everything about their high ticket prices except for cutting the price of their tickets.



Both can be tactics for publicity. Pointing at big bad ticketmaster for the cost of their tickets when PJ is still in control of 95% of the ticket costs outside of ticketmaster fees definitely has the air of a decision made for publicity. If you don't see it, you don't see it I guess.
nobody else did cut their share so they did more than anybody else. thats important for me.

now, i guess that if you wanna see publicity stants you gonna see them everywhere.



i cant convince anyone but i ll argue one more time:
if you are on top money-earning-wise as Pearl jam was in 95, you dont take risks. if you need publicity there are other less risky and painful ways to do it. so i dont see why i should be suspicious about them.
ziggywas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 02:19 PM   #16495 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Fan: Hey why are these tickets so expensive?
PJ: Well we would just charge you $65 for your premium seats but those jerks at Ticketmaster are adding on fees that make it a whopping $70! Ridiculous! Who on earth would pay that much for a ticket?

Once artists reach a certain point of popularity, there aren't many decisions that are made without considering how the public will receive it and if that will impact sales positively or negatively. That goes doubly true for artists signed to labels.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 02:34 PM   #16496 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 289
Default

of coursemthey re gonna thought what the public thinks. of course they counted that fans will like it. BUT the potential losses were in this case far greater than the potential gains. so i m not suspicious about it and i have no other reason to believe they didnt truly believe in this cause.

ticketmaster was applying monopoly practises (okay the courts didnt think so)
and the around 30% of ticket money that went their way is ridiculously high. and a big reason why ticket prices were high.

Last edited by ziggywas; 11-11-2019 at 02:36 PM. Reason: to believe
ziggywas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 02:37 PM   #16497 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

Quote:
i have a great respect for fugazi's ethos but i think its irrelevant here. Pearl Jam must've sold >15.000.000 records when they began the ticketmaster thing. it is a diferrent league.
Fugazi had every opportunity to be corporate sellouts as well.
__________________

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion

Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND:

https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html

OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 02:38 PM   #16498 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggywas View Post
so i m not suspicious about it and i have no other reason they didnt truly believe in this cause.
I don't think it's either/or, I'm just saying that the publicity end is very fitting for the marketing of that time and played a significant role in their decision to move forward and make the stink. I'm sure they really believed in what they were going up against just like how Metallica really believed in the Napster fight, but from where I'm sitting those were both missing swings.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 02:50 PM   #16499 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

https://www.seattletimes.com/enterta...-to-get-them/?

Quote:
tickets will cost $112 (not including service charges and fees)
Thanks Pearl Jam
__________________

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion

Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND:

https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html

OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 02:54 PM   #16500 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
I don't think it's either/or, I'm just saying that the publicity end is very fitting for the marketing of that time and played a significant role in their decision to move forward and make the stink. I'm sure they really believed in what they were going up against just like how Metallica really believed in the Napster fight, but from where I'm sitting those were both missing swings.
Don't forget Metallica's fight against Victoria's Secret. Especially don't forget the time Willy Yang was sued for drawing a Metallica logo on his notebook. #Napsterfight #VictoriasSecretfight #WillyYangfight
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.