Unpopular Music Opinions - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2016, 08:34 PM   #12311 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MicShazam View Post
I guess that happens in any art form.

If I'm not mistaken; isn't it also a pretty recent phenomenon that Lou Reed's Metal Machine music is actually considered legit good music by many people? I thought it was assumed to be a joke by everyone a while further back.
I'm sure that there have always been people who saw the brilliance in it, it's just lost its bandwagon hate over the years and people are listening to it differently. Probably. That's all conjecture.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 08:38 PM   #12312 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Terrapin_Station's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: NYC Man
Posts: 877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Basically anything past when the Beatles stopped being a boyband is forgotten. I'm assuming this was when Rolling Stone magazine started up and began telling people what to listen to. It's amazing the influence a magazine that nobody reads can have after all these years.
Good post. I agree re being amazed by the influence they continue to have.
Terrapin_Station is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 08:44 PM   #12313 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Rollingstone's 500 best albums list did turn me onto Kate Bush, PJ Harvey, Roxy Music and Bryan Ferry, so I appreciate that. The list was pretty one sided though. I seem to remember a ****load of Beatles, Dylan, Rolling Stones, Beach Boys and Springsteen dominating the top 50 with multiple entries each. Baby boomer white guy rock bias much.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 08:52 PM   #12314 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

It doesn't matter the original context. He might have been trying to make a piece of **** record. His intentions don't change the final product. It's a masterpiece. End of story. Not in this case but artists often hate their best works. I've read interviews with Art Blakey and Nick Cave and they have ridiculous opinions about their own music. Band members also sometimes don't understand or appreciate what the other members contributed. The Ramones and Pink Floyd are like that.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 08:53 PM   #12315 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Terrapin_Station's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: NYC Man
Posts: 877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
Re: Zeppelin

Rolling Stone Magazine HATED them. They slammed every one of their albums. The press in general hated them. They made their name off of underground FM stations and constant touring. They toured the US five times in their first year of existence. And each time they'd play bigger and bigger halls based solely on word of mouth.
Yeah, Rolling Stone wasn't kind to them in the early 70s, but they weren't at all "underground" either. They were constantly featured in Circus, Hit Parader, Rock, Groove, etc. magazines, and even in Creem. They were played regularly on all of the big FM album rock stations. And even Rolling Stone warmed up to them by the later 70s/early 80s.
Terrapin_Station is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 08:55 PM   #12316 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
It doesn't matter the original context. He might have been trying to make a piece of **** record. His intentions don't change the final product. It's a masterpiece. End of story. Not in this case but artists often hate their best works. I've read interviews with Art Blakey and Nick Cave and they have ridiculous opinions about their own music. Band members also sometimes don't understand or appreciate what the other members contributed. The Ramones and Pink Floyd are like that.
Death of the author and all that jazz.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 09:24 PM   #12317 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
It doesn't matter the original context. He might have been trying to make a piece of **** record. His intentions don't change the final product. It's a masterpiece. End of story. Not in this case but artists often hate their best works. I've read interviews with Art Blakey and Nick Cave and they have ridiculous opinions about their own music. Band members also sometimes don't understand or appreciate what the other members contributed. The Ramones and Pink Floyd are like that.
Ridiculous opinions in what sense?
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 10:09 PM   #12318 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

They dismiss earlier work that everyone with any sense knows is brilliant.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 10:12 PM   #12319 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
They dismiss earlier work that everyone with any sense knows is brilliant.
I think that this is a tool that some artists use to help themselves evolve as musicians, since distancing yourself from your earlier work helps keep you from falling into a rut. Or, they might simply be sick of it and it drives them to be overcritical of it.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 10:16 PM   #12320 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
They dismiss earlier work that everyone with any sense knows is brilliant.
Do you mean their own earlier work or do you mean artists that preceded them?
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.