|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-02-2015, 07:30 PM | #10401 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
One artist released a real banger yesterday.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
03-02-2015, 08:05 PM | #10402 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
03-02-2015, 08:31 PM | #10403 (permalink) | ||||
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The Organized Mind
Posts: 2,044
|
Quote:
I prefer Alvin Lucier's Music on a Long Thin Wire to Young's Poem for Chairs, Tables and Benches. Just the same, I've spun Trout Mask and Metal Machine Music on repeat for entire evenings while writing. Some albums just set a great atmosphere for the mind. EDIT: Oh, I almost forgot - I constructed a noise multimedia piece called 5'50" of Pop which simultaneously played the music videos for all 100 songs from my former retail hell's MUZAK station.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by innerspaceboy; 03-02-2015 at 08:36 PM. |
||||
03-07-2015, 12:57 PM | #10406 (permalink) | |
Out of Place
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: in an abstract house
Posts: 4,111
|
Quote:
Foo fighters has a couple of decent tunes but Nirvana is way better. The drumming in Nirvana is also way better, Dave although not a bad frontman to me excels more as a drummer than a singer.
__________________
"Hey Kids you got to meet the MIGHTY PIXIES!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbRbCtIgW3A |
|
03-07-2015, 12:59 PM | #10407 (permalink) |
.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
|
I don't mind Dave as a vocalist, but I definitely wouldn't see myself choosing Foo Fighters over Nirvana. Not to say anything bad about Foo Fighters though. I've listened to them a fair bit and I enjoy them, but they're just too safe if that makes sense.
|
03-07-2015, 01:29 PM | #10408 (permalink) |
Out of Place
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: in an abstract house
Posts: 4,111
|
To me Nirvana had a better defined sound than FF
Foo fighters although good always kinda emulated other bands in some of their songs, this song Is practically a Nirvana song, And this one is practically a QOTSA song, The songs to me that really define their unique sound are songs like 'Big me' which is the precursor to 'learn to fly' and 'Hero' & 'Everlong' those are the good songs that to me capture their actual signature style of playing but Kurt did that effortlessly in almost every song. (After Bleach) and that's why i prefer Nirvana. To put it simply i think Kurt is a better artist than Dave but i wouldn't go as far to say he is a better musician.
__________________
"Hey Kids you got to meet the MIGHTY PIXIES!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbRbCtIgW3A |
03-07-2015, 02:33 PM | #10409 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Portugal
Posts: 26
|
When I was about 14 I became addicted to Nirvana - I bought all studio albums, some LP's and live albums, as well as wallpapers. Nirvana is an important band and means a lot to me because it's a part of my teenage years. I still listen to them and I still like Kurt Cobain a lot.
I can't really say who's a better musician and in terms of success and impact I think Nirvana wins, hands down; but personally I prefer listening to the Foo Fighters, there's something amusing about them. I agree that Dave excels far more on the drums. I now think Alice In Chains is better than Nirvana, but I consider AIC to be closer to metal than grunge, while Nirvana is more punk. Oh another opinion, what's the deal about Avenged Sevenfold? Many people say they are one of the best contemporary artists - I don't think they suck, but there's way better modern bands out there. |
|