The Musicbanter Hall of Fame Nominations (blues, country, indie, rock)

~~bungalow~~ · 07-14-2006, 01:33 AM

Disagree.
The Eagles suck.

boo boo · 07-14-2006, 01:37 AM

Like most of the bands you like, only The Eagles don't suck.

And i really don't get it, looking at those who have been inducted already, why can't The Eagles be inducted?... Objectively in greatness terms, i'd consider them more worthy than Joshua Home, Immortal Technique or The Mars Volta, and especially The Fall Of Troy.

This is my problem, i think this whole thing is going to be biased against older bands in favor of modern music, so far, every artist that has been inducted is a modern day artist, save Bowie, the others are still very young artists, a couple of albums and they are already worthy for a hall of fame?... Whats the criteria anyway, if there is any.

The Eagles get my vote, so i agree.

TrampInaTux · 07-14-2006, 01:40 AM

It's not the threads problem, it's the members. If people don't like The Eagles then they disagree. It's stupid thinking 'I don't like The Eagles but they've been around for a while so let's put them in.'

~~bungalow~~ · 07-14-2006, 01:43 AM

The criteria is, you have to be good.
The Eagles suck.

boo boo · 07-14-2006, 01:43 AM

Thats the spirit, bands shouldn't get in based on preference alone should they?... I'm trying to add a objective spin here, yes i do like The Eagles, but thats not why i voted for them, i honestly think they deserve it.

boo boo · 07-14-2006, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bungalowbill357

The criteria is, you have to be good.
The Eagles suck.

Good is 100% subjective, so your criteria is sh*t, just like your taste in music.

~~bungalow~~ · 07-14-2006, 01:45 AM

So even if you don't like them, you should put vote them in because they have made a lot of sh*tty albums?
That doesn't make much sense at all boo boo, but what should I expect?

Quote:

just like your taste in music

Haha, okay boo boo.
You stick to classic rock and prog, and I'll listen to what I want. Which is far superior (Modest Mouse)

boo boo · 07-14-2006, 01:48 AM

No, being an extremely influencial band makes them worthy, they're a fairly talented and original band (i have heard Gram Parsons and The Byrds 70s material, so don't even try) and as far as impact goes, they pwn every current inductee but Bowie... Your bias is outstanding.

PS. Stop calling other people pretentious.

~~bungalow~~ · 07-14-2006, 01:52 AM

I think I would rather watch my entire family get fed through a woodchipper than listen to The Eagles, and EVERY artist inducted thus far is a hundred times better than this sh*tty country rock band.

Laces Out Dan! · 07-14-2006, 01:54 AM

They're not country rock

07-14-2006, 01:54 AM	#190 (permalink)
Laces Out Dan! I love Puck Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: British Columbia Posts: 4,614	They're not country rock __________________ We are entirely smooth, We admit to the truth, We are the best at what we do.

07-14-2006, 01:33 AM	#181 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	Disagree. The Eagles suck.

07-14-2006, 01:40 AM	#183 (permalink)
TrampInaTux that's my war face. Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,418	It's not the threads problem, it's the members. If people don't like The Eagles then they disagree. It's stupid thinking 'I don't like The Eagles but they've been around for a while so let's put them in.'

07-14-2006, 01:43 AM	#184 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	The criteria is, you have to be good. The Eagles suck.

07-14-2006, 01:52 AM	#189 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	I think I would rather watch my entire family get fed through a woodchipper than listen to The Eagles, and EVERY artist inducted thus far is a hundred times better than this sh*tty country rock band.