The Official The Stone Roses Thread - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2010, 09:29 PM   #21 (permalink)
air quote
 
Engine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt View Post
So in America people forget about bands just because they've stopped making music?
You have to be very special to Americans to keep their attention for over two decades with only one good album. Personally, I have always loved Stone Roses s/t and I always will.

Since we're talking about the US, it's interesting that the Stone Roses' subpar, eventual follow up album, Second Coming, is considered 'more popular in America' I guess because Squire wanks out some good ol' American-style blues guitar solos throughout. I obviously think it's far worse but I have run into several people who say they like it better than the first one. I'm always shocked when I hear that
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through.
Engine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2010, 09:30 PM   #22 (permalink)
love will tear you apart
 
TheCunningStunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 5,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine View Post
You have to be very special to Americans to keep their attention for over two decades with only one good album.
Jeff Buckley then? (almost)

And no one jump on my back about Sketches being good, that album p*sses me off. It makes me think 'Oh what might've been...'

And yeah, Second Coming is f*cking terrible. How anyone can prefer it is unfathomable.
__________________
I don't feel and I feel great.

Last FM
TheCunningStunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2010, 09:34 PM   #23 (permalink)
air quote
 
Engine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt View Post
And yeah, Second Coming is f*cking terrible. How anyone can prefer it is unfathomable.
That's the appropriate Mancunian reaction to the album - and I agree
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through.
Engine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2010, 09:33 AM   #24 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
TheElectricSlug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
Default

Pitchfork (which usually sucks) gave the The Stone Roses album a perfect 10/10.

Pitchfork: Album Reviews: The Stone Roses: The Stone Roses
TheElectricSlug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 05:04 AM   #25 (permalink)
Melancholia Eternally
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 5,018
Default

Stone Roses to 'reunite' as Ian Brown and John Squire 'bury hatchet' | News | NME.COM

No. Not buying it.
__________________

Last.FM | Echoes and Dust
Mojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 05:36 AM   #26 (permalink)
 
Zer0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,792
Default

Hmmm I doubt the rumours are true, something like that pops up nearly every year and gets denied by the band members. Besides I doubt Man. City are going to win the Premier League this year.
__________________
Zer0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 06:09 AM   #27 (permalink)
why bother?
 
Bulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 4,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mojopinuk View Post
Hearing that from the NME's as good as hearing who the next England manager's gonna be from the Sunday Mirror really.
Bulldog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 06:10 AM   #28 (permalink)
Melancholia Eternally
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 5,018
Default

It's sourced from a tabloid report aswell. As I say, I'm not buying it.
__________________

Last.FM | Echoes and Dust
Mojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 10:23 AM   #29 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Screen13 View Post
With the first Album and "Fools Gold," and even going back to "Sally Cinnamon," they had plenty of classic hooks. I stand by all of that. (Going by the first proper album release).

Their second album is only a pale shadow, but then again, it was created after a forced moment of silence (lawsuits and all that...), so it's understood where the fire died out. With "10 Story love Song" still playing in my mind years after the tape expired, to me there was at least a bit if all too short magic in there.

As for The Seahorses...sorry. Tons of potential sadly led up to a half-powered album with maybe a good moment or two in my opinion if I'm on a good day.

Enough of the crapping on. It's time to remember why they are remembered - a crowning album of 1989, the moment when things had to change quick. No better album did that than the S/T classic.
i agree to most of this except I haven't heard the Shirehorses and don't intend to
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 04:53 PM   #30 (permalink)
 
Zer0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,792
Default

Ha! I knew it

Mani rubbishes Stone Roses reunion rumours | Music | The Guardian
__________________
Zer0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.