|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-04-2011, 11:59 AM | #2454 (permalink) |
Engorged Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,536
|
Soundgardern 5
Nirvana 6 Pearl Jam 3 Nirvana, no contest.
__________________
last.fm | my collection on RYM | vinyl instagram @allthatyouseeandhear I'd love to see your signature/links too, but the huge and obnoxious ones have caused me to block all signatures. |
08-04-2011, 04:50 PM | #2457 (permalink) |
Your Ad Here
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Twilight Zone
Posts: 876
|
It's my preference for Soundgarden, compared to Nirvana or Pearl Jam that gets my vote out of these 3 albums. I have Badmotorfinger on the same level as Nevermind, but yeah. Soundgarden all day long between these 3.
Soundgardern 6 Nirvana 7 Pearl Jam 3 Last edited by Electrophonic Tonic; 08-05-2011 at 10:24 PM. |
08-06-2011, 12:56 PM | #2458 (permalink) | |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Quote:
The Monks Black Monk Time 1966
Versus The Sonics Here Are The Sonics!!! 1965 |
|
08-06-2011, 01:21 PM | #2460 (permalink) |
They/Them
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,914
|
Monks - 1
Sonics - 1 Hard to choose, but I feel the Sonics album loses a bit of originality by having so many rock 'n' roll covers. I'm also a sucker for experimentation, and the Monks do incorporate elements of it in some of their songs, such as "Higgle-Dy-Piggle -Dy," with its noisy, feedback-driven guitar solo. I love the spastic, dissonant keyboard parts and the rhythmic banjo-playing that's featured in some of the tracks, too. Plus, my avatar sort of speaks for itself (it's supposedly Dave from The Monks)... Last edited by TockTockTock; 08-07-2011 at 11:57 AM. |
|