I don't care about you comparing the two bands as they are both sh'it bands but the latter part. Nirvana didn't come along at a lull in music, they took the oportunity to take the sound The Wipers were doing for years and adapt it so it would oppeal to the populous. I also disagree with the garage bands comment but don't really want to get into that.

I've never heard of The Wipers, so your view may be right. My interest in grunge was mild, at best.

Maybe lull wasn't the right word. More like, a transitional period. Rap was gaining steam, and was beginning to show up in some melded version of metal. Pop, metal and rap were all sort of intertwining, so nobody really knew just what they were lisening to.

Nirvana was a clear cut change from what was on the radio.

Perhaps The Wipers needed better promotion.

so, what if beetoven wasn't deaf, i bet he woulda made ifferent music, or mayber, he wuldn't have made any music at all, maybe, being deaf prevented him from gettig with the ladies, so he turned to piano instead

something to think about

^ when you're sober

Hey Jr, was i right or was i ****ing right?

Classic rock loving elitist *******s, kiss my ass.

dude, that is RazorsInTheNight

I heard The Wipers, good band, but its easy to take alway all of Nirvanas credit and give it to their influences, even when they clearly dont deserve it.

Lets give The Beatles no credit for the british invasian whatsoever, lets just give all the credit to Buddy Holly and The Everly Brothers...Those talentless teeny boppers dont deserve credit for anything.

God people piss me off.

Oh.

I take it he didnt get the message when they banned his ass.

Obviously not :laughing:

HAHAHA

Hey, hey jibber...do you feel like a....like a drink?