Pete Doherty Vs. The World (indie, album, John Lennon, quote)

~~hiu~~ · 05-03-2006, 03:14 PM

I doubt she is even unconscious, the media just made it out like she was.

swim · 05-03-2006, 03:26 PM

So if she was conscious then it's ok?

~~hiu~~ · 05-04-2006, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swimintheundertow

So if she was conscious then it's ok?

Well it's not going to be as satisfying of course.

Tommyrocker · 05-07-2006, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

According to Docherty he wasn`t injecting her with anything he was taking some blood for an art project

i hope you get sued every penny for slander. or is written liable?

what about you over there? well you think i care?

and to the man who would be king i will say only one thing

LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA **** the critics doherty for life YEEEEE-AAAHH.

nah but on a serious note, absolutely adore the libs, babyshambles arnt the best band in the world but im awaiting the next album.

i personally love the way Doherty's a junkie but John Lennons a legend, right.
and at least dohertys seeing kate moss, not yoko bono oko nono.

sleepy jack · 05-07-2006, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommyrocker

i personally love the way Doherty's a junkie but John Lennons a legend, right.
and at least dohertys seeing kate moss, not yoko bono oko nono.

Theres a difference, Lennon had talent.

Tommyrocker · 05-07-2006, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill

Theres a difference, Lennon had talent.

subjective.

subjective

sleepy jack · 05-07-2006, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommyrocker

subjective.

subjective

Ok how about this, Lennon isn't idiolized for being a junkie hes idiolized for his music?

Urban Hat€monger ? · 05-07-2006, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommyrocker

i hope you get sued every penny for slander. or is written liable?

Really?

I didn`t say it his agent did

Sneer · 05-07-2006, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill

Ok how about this, Lennon isn't idiolized for being a junkie hes idiolized for his music?

Some people idolize Doherty over here for his music.
Now, im not saying he's in the same league as Lennon. no way. But i dont think if Lennon was alive today he'd be anywhere near as idolized as he is. i mean look at McCartney, hes respected but he's not idolized. seeing as i believe they were both equal in talent i think Lennon would be in a similiar league as that. Death immortalizes people. I do find it irritating though when a lot of silly, neanderthal indie kids jump on the Doherty bandwagon because its cool to like the bad boy, renegade character. This is no joke, i asked someone who "idolizes" Doherty what their favourite libs album is..he replied "Dont look back into the sun"

TrampInaTux · 05-08-2006, 01:21 AM

And the difference is I'm sure John Lennon didn't inject an unconscious girl with heroin. That's my sole reason for disliking Pete Doherty. Whatever he does to himself is fine, it's his own body, let him kill himself.

05-03-2006, 03:26 PM	#92 (permalink)
swim dontcareaboutyou Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina Posts: 5,188	So if she was conscious then it's ok? __________________ http://nakednaps.bandcamp.com/

05-03-2006, 03:14 PM	#91 (permalink)
~~hiu~~ Account Disabled Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,174	I doubt she is even unconscious, the media just made it out like she was.

05-08-2006, 01:21 AM	#100 (permalink)
TrampInaTux that's my war face. Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,418	And the difference is I'm sure John Lennon didn't inject an unconscious girl with heroin. That's my sole reason for disliking Pete Doherty. Whatever he does to himself is fine, it's his own body, let him kill himself.