Wild7Dustr |
01-03-2006 09:52 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by SabrinaMaher
the beatles were such a liked band/ loved band back in the day, and still have a big fan base now.. so i'm just wonder after the break up and john did his own thing and paul did his own thing.. which in your own opinions did better.. not looking at what the whole world thinks.. or who sold more whatever.. just in your thoughts...
thanks you
I personally think john is the best.. i love him.. and his music was about peace and love.. war.. he put alot of work into the meanings of his music.. up until he died.. i'm even going to go out of my place and say i think true rock n' roll died when he got shot.. :o( so sad.. anyways.. he is a amazing his music has more meaning to me then anything eles.. :o)
|
Oh, come on!!!You've got to be kidding me!!!Just "Imagine" that someone would create a thread as commonsense/stupid as this!!!:laughing: Well, I guess I'll cut you some slack because this is a thread dedicated to many different kinds of peoples opinions.:crazy:
Honestly, John Lennon is, was and forever will be the best when compared to Paul!!!John Lennon was always a great songwriter and his music has already stood the test of time many years after he died.Even though he died and Paul hasn't, it is still clear that John Lennon is on top, atleast I.M.O.Even "giving" Paul all that time to possibly surpass John Lennon as a great songwriter, he has failed.I don't mean failed as in a way of disrespect to Paul, though...
...Paul has been a great musician as well!!!He only has failed in the way that he never has and never will be as brilliant a musician and songwriter as John Lennon was and still is!!!:bringit: Also, another good point to bring up is that John Lennon was great with The Beatles as well as solo!!!Paul was pretty good with The Beatles, but he's had many rocky points in his solo career...
...You go up, you go down...You do good, you do bad, period!!!;)
|