paul took control of the band so much, if you see their early concerts, hes totally taking the show over. and it was his idea to stay in the studio 65' onwards, -which is where they made their greatest stuff. paul is more of a softer singer i thnk, (dispite helter skelter ect.) john was more gritty and just had a really a raw voice, songs like 'girl' , and 'im only sleeping' really show that. i dont think paul could ever had the same effect on the songs john was singing, (if paul was doin the vocals in em) all the beatles are amazing in their own way (maybe except ringo) but yea, and towards the end their talents and egos were getting way too big to be contained in one band, and breaking up was inevitable. so what im saying it that i like all of them, i cant choose.
|
