|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-07-2014, 10:17 AM | #41 (permalink) | |
Just Keep Swimming...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: See signature...
Posts: 7,765
|
Quote:
Then more snow tonight. Sure, why not. Thanks Obama.
__________________
See location... |
|
03-07-2014, 11:18 AM | #42 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
What's wrong with you people? Lord of the Rings is obviously superior, you get 8 endings for the price of one.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
03-07-2014, 12:44 PM | #44 (permalink) | |
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Totally Star Wars. I loved the LOTR movies, but they're exhausting to watch. Hence why I've only watched them a few times or just the once whereas I have no idea how many times I've watched the original Star Wars trilogy. They're part of my DNA at this point.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:46 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Neo-Maxi-Zoom-Dweebie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 3,752
|
Star Wars>>>>>>>>Blade Runner>>>>>>>>>>>>Logans Run>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>LOTR
__________________
" I slashed and burned thru my 15 minutes of fame." |
03-07-2014, 12:51 PM | #47 (permalink) |
David Hasselhoff
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in Portland, OR
Posts: 3,681
|
Star Wars > The Empire Strikes Back >>> Return Of The Jedi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anying after and including The Phantom Menace
|
03-08-2014, 06:20 PM | #48 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
Are you talking about all six movies? Because if so SW loses points for ****ing up a perfectly great trilogy with two-and-a-half crappy "prequels" (I liked "Revenge of the Sith" but doubt I'd watch it twice). LOTR never puts a foot wrong, and as you decreed the Hobbit movies can't be included then it's almost infinitisemally unlikely that there'll ever be more LOTR movies, therefore it's a perfect trilogy and wins easily for me.
Though I like both. But LOTR got me into fantasy novels, and has wizards elves and dwarves. I guess you could say the same about Star Wars (Obi-Wan/C3PO/R2D2 in that order) but only if you're really sad.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
03-08-2014, 06:31 PM | #49 (permalink) | |
David Hasselhoff
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in Portland, OR
Posts: 3,681
|
Quote:
I promise you it'll happen |
|
03-08-2014, 08:17 PM | #50 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
I don't see it. The Silmarillion is a very heavy book, mostly a history of Middle Earth. There's not too much real action in it and the main characters from LOTR aren't in it, not even Bilbo. I feel it would be very hard to film, though of course if there's enough money put forward anything can be done. I'm sure they'll call it something like "Before the Ring" or something: who's going to go to a movie called "The Silmarillion"?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|