Seeing as the old topic seems to have died....

Alright so I'm thinking of a 20-day-old siberian husky puppy (that howls!)






vs. polar bear cub.




NO, YOU CANNOT HAVE BOTH. So sorry.

I'll take the polar bear because when it's full grown I'll have the best side kick in town, not to mention the transportation capabilities. Also, when an overzealous environmentalist asks me if I care about the polar bears why do you if you're using a styrofoam cup, I can say bitch I own a polar bear, look at these pictures. It wouldn't even cost more to feed it. What does it take to feed a husky for a week? Pounds upon pounds of kibbles and bits. What does it take to feed a polar bear for a week? 21 Cokes. Plus huskies are too hyper for their own good.

That puppy is cute but polar bear cubs are one of the cutest things on earth so my vote goes with them. Plus, a polar bear succeeds on the cover of Crom's The Cocaine Wars where a puppy would have failed.

http://www.zhengaya.com/Pictures/ZR03small.gif

Husky: 0
Polar Bear: 2

Could a Husky have pulled this off? I don't think so...
http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/yOJGgCp4GqI/hqdefault.jpg

Husky --- 0
Polar Bear cub --- 3

Huck the Fuskies

Husky 1
Polar Bear cub 3


They both have the disadvantage of needing to be in colder climates but a husky will survive with some A/C. A Polar Bear most likely won't.

Polar bears are more badass

Huskies are more useful.

Realistically, a Polar Bear will grow up... and eat you. A Husky will love you for life, and you get to keep all your extremities and intestines.

+1 Husky

To be honest I think the polar bear is also failing at whatever the **** that is.