![]() |
seven pages of this... what has the forum come to especially when i'm pretty sure we've had threads related to order of operations before
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/p...g?t=1304136614 The 1 is unnecessary, but I wanted to add it so that everything would line up nicely in Photoshop. |
Haha this is great, oojay just got schooled completely by canwllcorfe who makes an excellent point. Fifty bucks says he still refuses to admit he's doing it completely wrong
He appears to think the the equation reads as 6/(2*(1+2)), but its obviously how canwll's doing it. And that's only if you ignore the PEMDAS rule, which clearly puts multiplication and division on the same level. |
Quote:
http://edu.glogster.com/media/5/25/75/42/25754207.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I still say that it's ambiguous due to the lack of a standard convention, and that it requires an extra set of parentheses to be exact in the order of evaluation, but hey, there's not much point in beating my head against a brick wall, people can easily read my previous posts in the thread :P
|
Quote:
EDIT: Here's a picture: http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/p...fe/mathtos.jpg You multiply the 6 by 3, getting 18. Then divide by 2. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.