Hitler's Facebook (country, Europe, American, track, quote)

midnight rain · 04-21-2009, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla

My grandfather fought in the war, and hundreds of thousands of our men died because of that war. We are a small country too. If American's really could have won the war hands down they would have got involved far earlier.

Beg pardon if I ask, but who's saying the American's could've won the war hands down?

**Scarlett O'Hara** · 04-21-2009, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzz

Beg pardon if I ask, but who's saying the American's could've won the war hands down?

That's the impression I've got from reading your replies.

midnight rain · 04-21-2009, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla

That's the impression I've got from reading your replies.

Really? Because I thought I made my position pretty clear in THIS post:

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzz

There's a difference between saying the U.S. getting involved is the reason the Allies won the war and saying the U.S. could've won the war on their own.

right-track · 04-21-2009, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzz

I'm not sure who you're speaking for when you say "the Americans"...

err...you;

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzz

I thought the Soviets played a more defensive game in WW2 than an offensive? I don't really have an extensive knowledge of WW2 but if not for their blistering cold weather, they would've lost Stalingrad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzz

Heh yeah, that D-Day was a walk through a fresh meadow...

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzz

I would love to see those statistics

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzz

This thread has devolved into the utterly typical U.S. vs. Britain war that consistently plagues this forum

right-track · 04-21-2009, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucifer_sam

now that i think about it that's probably why that pie chart looks like it does.

Then you'd be wrong.

**Scarlett O'Hara** · 04-21-2009, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzz

Really? Because I thought I made my position pretty clear in THIS post:

All I want to emphasise is that the Allies who originally fought for the majority of the war are the ones that held it together for as long as they could, and that is incredibly heroic. Funnily enough it took America getting bombed before they actually gave a shit about the rest of the world.

lucifer_sam · 04-21-2009, 05:07 PM

yeah i suppose not.

midnight rain · 04-21-2009, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by right-track

err...you;

1. is true before the United States got involved, it's not really disputable
2. was in defense of your slighting comment
3. was an honest question
4. is completely unrelated

right-track · 04-21-2009, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucifer_sam

yup

go read up on the rape of Nanking.

I just did...300,000 dead.

Holocaust...8 million.

You do the "math".

midnight rain · 04-21-2009, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla

All I want to emphasise is that the Allies who originally fought for the majority of the war are the ones that held it together for as long as they could, and that is incredibly heroic. Funnily enough it took America getting bombed before they actually gave a shit about the rest of the world.

Wow, that sounds like exactly the kind of comment I pointed out in that other post, the "me first" philosophy that all of our Eastern friends seem to think we hold.

And for the record, America was giving supplies to the Allies far before Pearl Harbor was bombed

04-21-2009, 05:07 PM	#47 (permalink)
lucifer_sam Unrepentant Ass-Mod Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Pennsylvania Posts: 3,921	yeah i suppose not. __________________ first.am