Spill Your Guts: What You Really Think About MB members

~~James~~ · 12-30-2014, 09:24 AM

Hardly anyone gets banned. The only ones I can think of were given literally 1000 chaces before the ban happened.

~~John Wilkes Booth~~ · 12-30-2014, 09:26 AM

i meant cause they banned sansa they can't unban her cause she said some rude **** to roxy or whatever. that seems kind of childish to me.

~~John Wilkes Booth~~ · 12-30-2014, 09:27 AM

and honestly i dunno why you guys let 216 get to you so much...

**Frownland** · 12-30-2014, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth

i meant cause they banned sansa they can't unban her cause she said some rude **** to roxy or whatever. that seems kind of childish to me.

Like James said, thousands of chances. That was just the straw that broke the camel's back.

Plus I don't hate dirty, he had his moments.

~~James~~ · 12-30-2014, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth

i meant cause they banned sansa they can't unban her cause she said some rude **** to roxy or whatever. that seems kind of childish to me.

I got on really well with Sansa, but yeah that wasn't the real reason. There were many incidents before that.
As for 216, that's a different story, but I am so sick of hearing about him.

~~John Wilkes Booth~~ · 12-30-2014, 09:35 AM

i think i'm really against banning in general. i mean besides spam bots. i feel like everybody should be able to handle themselves. sort of like anarchy except with a god to kill spam bots.

Plankton · 12-30-2014, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth

i think i'm really against banning in general. i mean besides spam bots. i feel like everybody should be able to handle themselves. sort of like anarchy except with a god to kill spam bots.

That could have an adverse effect. People are driven away when an unwanted member is allowed to stay and post crappy things. Losing one to keep many is the mindset here.

~~James~~ · 12-30-2014, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Plankton

That could have an adverse effect. People are driven away when an unwanted member is allowed to stay and post crappy things. Losing one to keep many is the mindset here.

Spot on. Constant flame wars don't attract new members either.

Dr_Rez · 12-30-2014, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James

Spot on. Constant flame wars don't attract new members either.

I love flame wars.

~~John Wilkes Booth~~ · 12-30-2014, 10:05 AM

really? it seems like the internet is the opposite of real life. like when two people start fighting generally that gathers a crowd rather than dispersing one.

12-30-2014, 09:24 AM	#7571 (permalink)
~~James~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 4,483	Hardly anyone gets banned. The only ones I can think of were given literally 1000 chaces before the ban happened.

12-30-2014, 09:26 AM	#7572 (permalink)
~~John Wilkes Booth~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 2,235	i meant cause they banned sansa they can't unban her cause she said some rude **** to roxy or whatever. that seems kind of childish to me.

12-30-2014, 09:27 AM	#7573 (permalink)
~~John Wilkes Booth~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 2,235	and honestly i dunno why you guys let 216 get to you so much...

12-30-2014, 09:35 AM	#7576 (permalink)
~~John Wilkes Booth~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 2,235	i think i'm really against banning in general. i mean besides spam bots. i feel like everybody should be able to handle themselves. sort of like anarchy except with a god to kill spam bots.

12-30-2014, 10:05 AM	#7580 (permalink)
~~John Wilkes Booth~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 2,235	really? it seems like the internet is the opposite of real life. like when two people start fighting generally that gathers a crowd rather than dispersing one.