You mean when you were lying about studies and I kicked you in the balls? Yeah the egg was really on my face.

I remember you moving goalposts around like a mother****er when I cited the Australian studies as a basis for interest in the drug. Guess that egg still hasn't come off.

Come on man, his leg hairs turn blonde in the sun. I'd be out there too if I had that kind of power.

If you had a brain in your head you wouldn't cling to some study as a life raft. That's not how science works. It's how click bait articles and cable news do science.

Lol what are you even talking about. Your position was that there was no good reason why studies would be done on ivermectin. You cited a single study as some kind of gotcha as to why it wasn't worth looking into, to which I responded with more studies and information, all of which goes way further to support the points that I made as opposed to yours. If you knew how science worked, you wouldn't have disagreed with me to begin with.

Says the guy who thought the quantum mechanics measurement paradox means that human consciousness affects measurements

Are you on crack? My point was that several positive studies on ivermectin have been found to be fraudulent and while it's too early to have scientific consensus the findings we do have are leaning toward no effectiveness.

Lol you only made that point after you accused the Australian studies I cited as being fraudulent. You were so sure that there was literally no good reason why people would be doing studies on it. And I didn't even get to the good stuff with Uttar Pradesh.

Dean Radin > Jan Walleczek

I don't know if you're lying or just have an inflated sense of your own memory.

09-07-2021, 11:54 PM :love:

This is where you started to backpeddle and cry.