![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Saying keep punching at it isn't just a mistake. It's a hilarious mistake. |
Haha! Yes, all very droll. [EDIT: about the "punchline"]
One thing that makes me favour the Dems is that as a party, they better reflect the ethnic diversity of the US. If equality of opportunity is a central plank of social justice, the Dems are closer to reflecting that ideal in the actual make up of their party: % Party Composition by Race, 2012: ............ .Dems.. GOP White ....... 60 .... 89 Black ........ 22 ..... 2 Hispanic .... 13 ..... 6 Asian/other . 5 ..... 3 Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/160373/...tly-white.aspx The GOP 89% white is not a particularly good look in this day and age, which is why the GOP worked hard to give a different impression at their recent conference. |
Quote:
As for the self defense caveat, it seemed ok to me, and it even had a caveat of its own attached, which suggests Biden can engage his brain and come up with connected meaningful sentences while under pressure. |
Quote:
Do you think the GOP has less blacks and hispanics because the party is making some active effort to stop them from running as a member of their party (i.e. a lack of opportunity)? Joe Biden has a pretty good hold on the black vote, but he probably decided to get a woman of color as his running mate to appeal to white liberals who care about the ethnic makeup of the ticket. |
Biden is such a promising candidate that his biggest selling point is a half functioning brain.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The framing and having to ask in the first place is pretty telling.
|
Quote:
|
He's free to make his argument as I am to make mine.
Framing the discussion around tangential literalist flaws in subarguments is a tried and true tactic to ignore or obfuscate that broader argument that poisons the well just as much as pointing it out. I don't think you're doing it intentionally btw, it's just trendy rinow. |
Quote:
Fair enough - what part of my question do you take issue with as a tangential literalist flaw? The use of the word "active" to describe "effort"? I'd be more than willing to reframe the question without that. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:20 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.