Should perma-banned members be given another chance? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Well?
Yes 3 14.29%
No, never 4 19.05%
Maybe, under certain circumstances 8 38.10%
Undecided 0 0%
Only if the ban was requested 1 4.76%
Just JWB and Sansa 2 9.52%
Anal Beads 3 14.29%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2018, 09:58 AM   #81 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluff View Post
So you agree then that they should be allowed to post again just on a new account?
Absolutely not. You mean like sockpuppets? That should only happen if permission is given, or the old account can be activated, I don't care. But nobody should be able to "cleverly" circumvent the rules, is the point.
Quote:

JWB signs up every now and then. Actually both of them have posted since the bans so point a) I would say yes and as for the second two questions JWB was hardly abusive or a c*nt so not sure what he'd have to change tbh. What was he banned for TH?
The problem with JWB, and I do like the guy, is that he continually pushes the mods' buttons (nearly wrote "bottoms" there! That could have been interesting! ) by posting sockpuppet accounts, knowing he's banned. I think originally he was banned for something to do with racial slurs? Jews maybe? I don't know. Maybe he got at someone personally. I really can't remember and I don't actually know, but he always seemed to be riding the edges, metaphorically dropping his pants and sticking his arse out the window and giving the cops (our mods) the finger, saying "Go on, arrest me, I dare ya!" so it wasn't a surprise.

I'll be interested to see what Ori says to my last post, if he replies. WHY should these people be let back in? What have they done to deserve it, and why now? Have any of them agreed to change/behave/obey the rules? In my opinion, it's not enough to say they've been banned long enough and there's no other reason. Do you let a mass murderer out of jail just because you think he's learned his lesson? Yeah, that's right: I compared them to mass murderers. Of the forum, sure.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 09:58 AM   #82 (permalink)
Ask me how!
 
Oriphiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The States
Posts: 5,354
Default

@TH You won't know if they'll behave until they come back. If they don't, then away they go again.

Rules are bent here all the time. Following them to the letter purely because "they're the rules" is arbitrary. What matters is that the community is happy, not that all the rules are followed blindly. Otherwise, Bat, Hawk, Chula, and I, would've been kicked out a long time ago.

Yes, I'd like to see Sansa and JWB get another chance. If you plugged more back when they came around often, you'd know that they're actually pretty chill.

You're acting like giving a few members one last chance would ruin everything, when realistically only one of two things would happen; they'd either prove that they've learned their lesson, and contribute to the community, or they'd lapse and be effortlessly and painleasly banned.

The fact that you're so staunchly opposed to this quite simple and reasonable prospect, and you're admission that you'd immediately ignore Sansa if she came back, really makes it seem like you really can't let go of all that stuff that happened between you two. You've gotta let that shit go.
__________________
----------------------
|---Mic's Albums---|
----------------------
-----------------------------
|---Deafbox Industries---|
-----------------------------
Oriphiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 10:01 AM   #83 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oriphiel View Post
And years of being banned are enough of a punishment for their disregard.
Only if they received a years-long ban and not a permanent one.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 10:07 AM   #84 (permalink)
Ask me how!
 
Oriphiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The States
Posts: 5,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubber soul View Post
Out of curiosity, did it occur to you guys that maybe Ori is simply causing mischief as usual?
Shhhh!

I actually did kinda make this and the smoking thread to liven things up and get people talking about stuff other than footie. But now I'm sort of curious why TH is so staunchly opposed to what I think is a pretty reasonable position.
__________________
----------------------
|---Mic's Albums---|
----------------------
-----------------------------
|---Deafbox Industries---|
-----------------------------
Oriphiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 10:08 AM   #85 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oriphiel View Post
@TH You won't know if they'll behave until they come back. If they don't, then away they go again.

Rules are bent here all the time. Following them to the letter purely because "they're the rules" is arbitrary. What matters is that the community is happy, not that all the rules are followed blindly. Otherwise, Bat, Hawk, Chula, and I, would've been kicked out a long time ago.

Yes, I'd like to see Sansa and JWB get another chance. If you plugged more back when they came around often, you'd know that they're actually pretty chill.

You're acting like giving a few members one last chance would ruin everything, when realistically only one of two things would happen; they'd either prove that they've learned their lesson, and contribute to the community, or they'd lapse and be effortlessly and painleasly banned.

The fact that you're so staunchly opposed to this quite simple and reasonable prospect, and you're admission that you'd immediately ignore Sansa if she came back, really makes it seem like you really can't let go of all that stuff that happened between you two. You've gotta let that shit go.
Answer my simple questions: WHY and WHY NOW? What has changed? And has there been any communication with either/both in which they've indicated they would "behave", for want of a better word?

I won't be letting anything go, and that's my prerogative. I loathe and despise Sansa like I really don't loathe and despise anyone else, so she is on Ignore even though she's not here and will remain so if she is allowed back. That won't be changing. This isn't about her. You have to explain why you think ANYONE deserves a second chance, after been given, let's not forget, multiple warnings, temp bans and chances galore. People who constantly flout the authority here have no right, in my opinion, to a second chance UNLESS they have stated their intention to change. Otherwise, waste of time.

Anyway it's as always up to the mods, so what I think has no bearing on this. And please stop using the word "arbitrary" incorrectly.
Following them to the letter purely because "they're the rules" is arbitrary.
This couldn't be more wrong. Following the rules that suit you because you want to IS arbitrary. Following all the rules because they're the rules is the furthest thing from arbitary you could get.

And nobody's saying everyone follows all the rules. I've broken some. But when you break the rules, you get warned, or temporarily banned. If you consistently break ALL or the major rules, and ignore warnings and think you can do what you like, you get a permaban. And a permaban should be permanent, otherwise what is it?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 10:13 AM   #86 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Black Country
Posts: 8,827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Absolutely not. You mean like sockpuppets? That should only happen if permission is given, or the old account can be activated, I don't care. But nobody should be able to "cleverly" circumvent the rules, is the point.
I'm not suggesting sockpuppets.

You said there has to be a line somewhere or there is no point (meaning the ban has to be permanent). Well the permaban would still stand but they'd be free to post on a new account, so they've lost their original account and have to start again from 0. What's the problem?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oriphiel View Post
@TH You won't know if they'll behave until they come back. If they don't, then away they go again.
It would be easier to let them post again just to stop these discussions, then the mods can just pull the plug on them if they act up. Win win for the mods.

Quote:
You're acting like giving a few members one last chance would ruin everything, when realistically only one of two things would happen; they'd either prove that they've learned their lesson, and contribute to the community, or they'd lapse and be effortlessly and painleasly banned.
^^
Cuthbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 10:17 AM   #87 (permalink)
Call me Mustard
 
rubber soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluff View Post
I'm not suggesting sockpuppets.

You said there has to be a line somewhere or there is no point (meaning the ban has to be permanent). Well the permaban would still stand but they'd be free to post on a new account, so they've lost their original account and have to start again from 0. What's the problem?
Well wouldn't that make them a sock puppet anyway?


Quote:
It would be easier to let them post again just to stop these discussions, then the mods can just pull the plug on them if they act up. Win win for the mods.


Well, not really. If there were antagonistic towards other members, it could kill the morale here. That would be especially troublesome given Exo's recent edict.

^^
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pet_Sounds View Post
But looking for quality interaction on MB is like trying to stay hydrated by drinking salt water.
rubber soul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 10:18 AM   #88 (permalink)
county fair energy
 
WWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,773
Default

Neither one of them would come back even if given the chance, tbh.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I know what real life is, I've been living in it for well over a decade
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadis View Post
WWWP is pretty but should be cancelled (digital blackface)

#DEMODFROWNLAND
#TERMLIMITSFORMODERATORS
WWWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 10:21 AM   #89 (permalink)
Ask me how!
 
Oriphiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The States
Posts: 5,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
Only if they received a years-long ban and not a permanent one.
Tbh, I thought you of all the mods would agree with this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oriphiel View Post
Rules are bent here all the time. Following them to the letter purely because "they're the rules" is arbitrary. What matters is that the community is happy, not that all the rules are followed blindly. Otherwise, Bat, Hawk, Chula, and I, would've been kicked out a long time ago.
The intended length of the ban when it was given doesn't matter nearly as much as the benefit of the ban to the community, unless someone (like TH) has a personal interest in the ban, making the to-the-letter enforcement of it arbitrary rather than truly beneficial.

@ TH, you've already admitted that you have a personal stake against Sansa. And therefore, you proved that your adherence to the rules in this case is arbitrary. As you yourself said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Following the rules that suit you because you want to IS arbitrary.
__________________
----------------------
|---Mic's Albums---|
----------------------
-----------------------------
|---Deafbox Industries---|
-----------------------------
Oriphiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2018, 10:22 AM   #90 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

I don't agree with red herrings.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.