|
Quote:
|
Mark Dice - It's Spreading
|
Quote:
I also love when they describe people being able to express their opinions as “crappy” |
I hate it when people over simplify white privilege to a degree that really misconstrues the concept.
|
Quote:
Most people who believe it exists will give you a different definition. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Being white doesn't mean everything is handed to you. It means you are far less likely to face certain road blocks that minorities face. Examples would be how often black people get followed around in stores by managers thinking they are going to steal while white people aren't used to it. Or how there are more white legacy students in college than there are any particular minority. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
How the **** one group isn’t held accountable for constantly robbing and shoplifting and staying in stores for retardedly long times (like really? 45 minutes in a minimart to buy a 40?) and another group of people are vilified for keeping an eye on the people who steal their ****. It’s ****ing incredible. Nobody ****ing wants to follow hostile blacks around. But do you ever hear blacks say goddamnit our people need to get their **** together and stop stealing from these Koreans? **** no! They bitch about the Koreans and somehow sell the story to whitey that they’re the ****ing victims. White people aren’t used to it because white people go in the store, buy what they want, and ****ing leave. Like you’re supposed to do. |
Quote:
No doubt someone will find a way to blame the shoplifting on whites as well. |
Quote:
It's obviously a lot different over there, which is why Monkey takes that attitude, and so frankly would I. I guess he should have said "it doesn't exist here." |
Quote:
But seriously, are you kidding or delusional? |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And no. Holding a whole race accountable is not okay. That's racism. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The problem with the white privilege claim is actually showing systematic white privilege. Also, the definition WIDELY varies. Bunch of anecdotes and questionable stats used on both sides. There is a difference between anecdotal racism holding down some minorities and systematic white privilege. Too much damn nuance to wrap my head around.. Idk.
Quote:
and the legacy thing - unless youre talking percentages that doesn't demonstrate anything. Please explain as I'm pretty ignorant about this topic. Also, not accepting white privilege exists doesn't require evidence based on the same logic that not accepting God's existence doesnt require evidence. You don't get to just throw out reason because emotion. To all: If everyone in the entire world was one race, do you think there wouldn't be certain groups of people that got ahead? It seems to be a fundamental characteristic of society.. what would you blame it on if there were only white people and how do you know some of those factors aren't also part of the problem currently? As always, I take the position.. yeah there's that, but there is also this. |
The problem with rejecting the existence of white privilege is the idea that it has to be systematically enforced when it's really a cultural norm. Also, the definition WIDELY varies.
|
So snarky..
|
I'm right though. You're demanding a systemic example of privilege when it's an issue based on implicit biases. I mean if you really want the justification, it's the echoes of slavery and Jim Crow.
|
That's definitely not how I've heard it presented.. "Systematic" is always paired with "white privilege" in the debates I've heard. Your point is another topic completely. Lucem used the term in the post that kicked off this discussion.
Also, I'm not demanding anything.. Go get pissed and come back so we can troll Chula. |
Much like free speech, ithe concept been hijacked by obnoxious ideologues.
What's your interpretation of white privilege? I mean as a term, not whether or not you agree with its validity. |
Without giving it much thought, something along the lines of: an inherent societal advantage centered around racial identity.
|
So where does the requirement for privilege to be systematic fit into that?
|
White privilege doesn't have to be a Bond villain.
|
Quote:
But if you want to follow that line of reasoning: if society recognizes some sort of privilege exists for a specific group and creates legislation, or whatever, to address it than what are we left with? Is white privilege still a thing or just some philosophical race bating dialogue? And how do you go about determining if the scales are balanced? |
Just to be fair, my definition is widespread benefits based off of paradigms built on a history of legislatively systemic privilege.
I don't think that legislation is the right approach because it would be too difficult to write without pitfalls and too hard to overturn once those pitfalls are reached. Education and awareness is the best approach on top of encouraging diversity to remove those implicit biases. |
You and I both know that "education and awareness" is not good enough for people, because bandaids are better than solutions. Also, ain't no one got time for that.
Using your definition can you give me an example of non-systematic white privilege? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You ****ing eggheads have at it. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:20 PM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.